Non-Invasive Neurostimulation Device With Varying Stimulus Sequences

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing non-invasive coordinated reset (CR) stimulation methods for neurological and psychiatric diseases face variability in effectiveness due to fluctuations in stimulus intensity and organismic parameters, leading to inconsistent therapeutic outcomes across stimulation epochs.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method utilizing a control unit and stimulation unit that generate and adapt sensory stimuli across multiple channels to desynchronize pathologically synchronous neuronal activity, employing fast-varying and slowly varying stimulus sequences to achieve robust and long-lasting therapeutic effects by resetting neuronal phases and reducing synaptic weights.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional CR stimulation is applied with fixed stimulus intensity, then the stimulation effect can be achieved, but the effectiveness varies significantly due to fluctuations in stimulus intensity and organismic parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic effect consistencyVSAvoiddependence on initial conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the stimulus sequence varying over time rather than fixed. The control unit generates stimulus sequences that adapt their parameters (intensity, timing, pattern) dynamically based on the stimulation epoch and organismic state, allowing the system to respond to fluctuations and maintain consistent therapeutic effects across different conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by modifying multiple stimulus parameters including intensity, duration, frequency, and temporal patterns. The control unit adjusts these parameters across different stimulation epochs to compensate for organismic fluctuations, thereby improving reliability while reducing dependence on initial conditions through systematic parameter variation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If stimulus intensity is increased to ensure therapeutic effect, then the effectiveness improves, but the dependence on organismic parameters and initial conditions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestimulation successVSAvoidrobustness to parameter fluctuations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic stimulus sequences that adapt their intensity and other parameters over time rather than applying fixed high intensity. This allows the stimulation to remain effective while being less sensitive to organismic parameter fluctuations, as the varying sequence can compensate for changes in system state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic variation in stimulus parameters including intensity modulation across stimulation epochs. This periodic action creates a stimulation pattern that is more robust to fluctuations in organismic parameters, as the varying intensity profile can adapt to changing conditions without requiring consistently high intensity levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If fixed stimulus sequences are used, then the device complexity is low, but the therapeutic effect varies from stimulation epoch to stimulation epoch

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffect consistencyVSAvoidstimulus sequence variation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit generates dynamic stimulus sequences that vary over time, replacing fixed sequences with adaptive patterns. This increases device complexity but significantly improves effect consistency by allowing the stimulation to adapt to organismic fluctuations across different stimulation epochs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the control unit adjusts stimulus sequences based on responses from previous stimulation epochs and measured organismic parameters. This feedback loop enables the device to maintain consistent therapeutic effects while managing complexity through intelligent adaptation rather than purely complex hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If stimulus parameters are adapted to initial conditions, then the initial effect can be optimized, but the long-lasting effect and robustness to fluctuations are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelong-lasting therapeutic effectVSAvoiddependence on initial conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses dynamic stimulus sequences that continue to adapt throughout the treatment course rather than being optimized only for initial conditions. This dynamic adaptation maintains long-lasting therapeutic effects while reducing dependence on initial conditions, as the varying sequences can respond to changes in organismic state over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements systematic parameter changes across stimulation epochs, including variations in intensity, timing, and pattern. These parameter changes enable the stimulation to maintain effectiveness over the long term while being less dependent on initial conditions, as the varying parameters can compensate for drift in organismic state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10350410B2Device and method for effective non-invasive neurostimulation by means of varying stimulus sequences
Publication Date: 2019.07.16 GRETAP AG
  • US10350410B2 patent drawing
  • US10350410B2 patent drawing
  • US10350410B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device is provided for stimulating neurons that includes a non-invasive stimulation unit that generates stimuli in multiple stimulation channels. The stimulation unit generates the stimuli to stimulate a neuron population in the brain and/or spinal cord of a patient using the stimulation channels in different locations. Moreover, the device includes a control unit that controls the stimulation unit to repeatedly generates sequences of the stimuli with the order of the stimulation channels in which stimuli are generated within a sequence being constant for 20 or more successively generated sequences before it is varied.