Charge-Balancing Neurostimulator With Dynamic Current Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional neurostimulator designs face challenges such as high power consumption, low channel density, and the inability to actively monitor residual charge, making them unsuitable for implantable devices, especially for applications like cortical and vagus nerve stimulation.

Innovation Solution

An integrated, high-voltage, high-density microstimulator system with a dynamic current allocation network (DCAN) and charge-balancing techniques, featuring a pair of current drivers and a microelectrode array, which allows for efficient delivery of electrical stimulation and reduces residual voltage through active charge-balancing mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional stimulator designs use discrete components to achieve high-voltage compliance and high output impedance, then the desired electrical stimulation performance is achieved, but the device becomes bulky with low channel-count and high power consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical stimulation performanceVSAvoiddevice size and power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates multiple current drivers and functional blocks into a single system-on-chip (SoC) architecture, combining discrete components into unified integrated circuits. This merging approach maintains the required high-voltage compliance and output impedance while reducing device size and power consumption suitable for implantable applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The stimulator design implements multi-functional current drivers that can serve multiple channels and different stimulation requirements through a single integrated unit. The universal current driver architecture allows the same hardware to perform various stimulation functions across multiple channels, reducing overall device complexity and power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of manufacture

If custom system-on-chip stimulators employ feedback-assisted current mirror structure and high voltage process, then integration is improved, but chip area becomes large which is undesirable for implantation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveintegrationVSAvoidchip area
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the chip area by implementing shared resources among multiple channels, including common current mirrors, capacitors, and control logic. This segmentation strategy reduces redundant circuitry and minimizes overall chip area while maintaining full integration benefits for implantable devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If off-chip DC blocking capacitors are used instead of charge-balancing mechanisms, then integration is simplified, but channel density becomes poor and integration into large-scale stimulator implants becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration simplicityVSAvoidchannel density
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the charge-balancing function with the current driver circuitry by integrating charge-balancing capacitors and control logic directly into the driver blocks. This integration eliminates the need for separate off-chip capacitors while enabling high channel density through efficient use of on-chip resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Productivity

If prior high-channel stimulator SoCs use simple cascode current mirror structure to increase channel count, then channel density is improved, but output impedance becomes insufficient and charge-balancing capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel countVSAvoidoutput impedance and charge-balancing
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic charge-balancing control where the charge-balancing capacitors are selectively connected to different current drivers based on real-time monitoring of residual charge. This dynamic approach allows the system to maintain high output impedance and proper charge-balancing across multiple channels while preserving high channel density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10716941B2System and method for charge-balancing neurostimulator with neural recording
Publication Date: 2020.07.21 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
  • US10716941B2 patent drawing
  • US10716941B2 patent drawing
  • US10716941B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for an implantable neurostimulator system comprising an array of microelectrodes, a pair of current drivers, and a dynamic current allocation network (DCAN). Each current driver in the pair of current drivers is configured to deliver a respective portion of an electrical signal to the array of microelectrodes to deliver the desired electrical stimulation through the array of microelectrodes to the subject. The DCAN is coupled to the pair of current drivers and the array of microelectrodes to selectively electrically connect each of the pair of the current drivers to individual microelectrodes in the array of microelectrodes to deliver the electrical signal to selective collections of less than all microelectrodes in the array of microelectrodes to deliver the desired electrical stimulation. The pair of current drivers and the DCAN are arranged in respective or a common housing configured to be implanted into the subject.