Inventory Prediction for New Items Using Similarity Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current inventory control systems face challenges in predicting and managing inventory for newly added items, as they struggle to accurately determine when and how many new items to include in the product assortment to meet customer demand, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that aggregates sales data from a database, identifies similar items using a multi-stage similarity and classification module with K-Nearest Neighbors algorithm, calculates target metrics, and predicts average inventory for new items by averaging turn predictions, thereby optimizing inventory assortment and maximizing retail sales.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional inventory control methods are used for new items, then implementation is simple, but prediction accuracy is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the inventory prediction process into multiple stages: data aggregation from multiple sources, similarity identification using K-Nearest Neighbors, turn rate calculation, and average inventory prediction. This segmentation allows complex prediction tasks to be broken down into manageable components, improving accuracy while maintaining systematic control over complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces turn rate as an intermediary metric between sales data and average inventory prediction. By calculating turn rates from similar items and using them as intermediate predictions, the system bridges the gap between historical data and new item inventory forecasts, enhancing prediction accuracy through a mediating computational layer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If more new items are added to meet customer demand, then customer satisfaction increases, but inventory costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassortment flexibilityVSAvoidinventory cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary inventory prediction and assortment selection for new items before they are fully integrated into the product catalog. By predicting average inventory and turn rates in advance, the system enables proactive inventory planning that allows flexible assortment expansion while controlling costs through data-driven decision making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts inventory parameters (average inventory levels, turn rates) based on predicted metrics from similar items. This parameter optimization allows the system to adapt assortment flexibility to actual demand patterns, expanding product variety only where predicted inventory turnover justifies the investment, thereby balancing assortment versatility against inventory costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If simple similarity matching is used, then processing speed is fast, but prediction reliability is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The similarity identification process is segmented into multiple computational stages including data preprocessing, feature extraction, K-Nearest Neighbors matching, and turn rate calculation. This segmentation improves prediction reliability by systematically processing data through multiple validation layers while maintaining processing efficiency through modular computation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous processing of sales data, similarity metrics, and turn rate calculations as an ongoing operational workflow. By continuously aggregating data and updating predictions rather than performing batch processing, the system sustains high prediction reliability through constant data refinement while maintaining processing speed through streamlined continuous computation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS11042837B2System and method for predicting average inventory with new items
Publication Date: 2021.06.22 WALMART APOLLO LLC
  • US11042837B2 patent drawing
  • US11042837B2 patent drawing
  • US11042837B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example method for predicting average inventory with newly added items can include: aggregating sales data of a plurality of items, the items comprising training items and new items; identifying, using a set of predefined rules, a data set of similar items on the training items for each of the new items, the set of predefined rules comprising a first stage similarity module, a second stage similarity module, and a second stage classification module; obtaining target metrics for each of the new items, the target metrics being turn predictions from the data set of the similar items; calculating mean errors of the turn predictions to identify a set of turn predictions with mean errors lower than a dynamic threshold; obtaining an ultimate turn prediction for each new item by averaging the set of turn predictions; and predicting an average inventory for each new item based on the ultimate turn prediction.