NF-Level Northbound Fault Reporting Microservice for O-RAN Reliability
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
The existing fault management systems in 5G O-RAN architectures face challenges in efficient event notification delivery to Northbound Management Systems due to resource constraints and the inability to independently manage core logic and reporting agents, leading to increased resource usage and limitations in high availability and load balancing.
Innovation Solution
Implementing a separate fault reporting microservice independent of the Fault Management Microservice (FM MS) to handle event reporting, allowing independent management of high availability and load balancing, and enabling fine-grained control over resources and retry mechanisms.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Device complexity
If fault management and event reporting are integrated in a single microservice, then system complexity is reduced, but resource usage increases and high availability management becomes limited
Solution Approach 1:
The patent divides the fault management system into separate microservices: the Fault Management Microservice (FM MS) handles core fault management logic, while the Fault Reporting Microservice (FR MS) handles event reporting independently. This segmentation allows each service to be optimized and managed separately, reducing overall resource usage while maintaining functionality.
Solution Approach 2:
The event reporting functionality is extracted from the fault management microservice and placed in a separate fault reporting microservice. This extraction enables independent management of reporting resources and improves the ability to implement high availability and load balancing specifically for reporting operations.
2Ease of manufacture
If fault management and event reporting are integrated in a single microservice, then deployment is simpler, but high availability and load balancing management becomes less flexible
Solution Approach 1:
By segmenting the system into separate FM MS and FR MS, each service can be deployed and managed independently. This allows different deployment strategies, high availability configurations, and load balancing approaches to be applied to each service based on its specific requirements.
Solution Approach 2:
The separate microservice architecture enables dynamic and flexible management of high availability and load balancing for the fault reporting function. The FR MS can be scaled, replicated, and configured independently to meet changing demands without affecting the core FM MS.
3Reliability
If retry mechanisms are implemented in the integrated fault management system, then reporting reliability improves, but resource overhead increases
Solution Approach 1:
The retry mechanism is extracted and implemented specifically in the fault reporting microservice, allowing retry policies to be applied only to reporting operations without impacting core fault management resources. This targeted approach improves reporting reliability while minimizing overall resource overhead.
4Adaptability or versatility
If transport mechanisms are updated in the integrated system, then system adaptability improves, but core fault management operations are affected
Solution Approach 1:
The transport mechanism functionality is extracted and placed in the fault reporting microservice, which is independent of the core fault management microservice. This allows transport mechanisms to be updated, modified, or replaced without affecting the stability or operations of the core FM MS, thereby improving adaptability while maintaining stability.
Data Source
AI summary
Provided are a method, computer readable medium, and system for reporting data to a Northbound Management System (NBMS) via a Network Function (NF) level Northbound Fault reporting Microservice (MS) in an NF of a Radio Access Network (RAN). The method includes: receiving, by a Fault Management (FM) MS from at least one other MS of the NF, events data; processing, by the FM MS, the events data; obtaining, by the Fault reporting MS, the processed data; and reporting, from the Fault reporting MS to the NBMS, the processed data.


