NFC Payment Authentication via Vehicle Plate Association

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current payment card fraud detection and prevention systems are inadequate in verifying user identity and activity, especially in scenarios like driverless vehicles, leading to instances of fraudulent activity and false positives, resulting in economic losses and poor user experience.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing Near Field Communication (NFC) circuits to determine if an association exists between a vehicle's registration plate code and a processing device's identification, facilitating real-time validation of payment transactions by comparing numeric or alphanumeric codes to assess transaction validity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional fraud detection methods (ZIP code, CVV, behavioral models) are used, then some fraud prevention is achieved, but false positives occur and user experience deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary authentication system that mediates between the user and the transaction system. This intermediary uses NFC technology to automatically verify the processing device's association with the vehicle without requiring user input, thus maintaining high fraud detection accuracy while avoiding false positives from traditional methods that disrupt user experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical/manual authentication methods (entering ZIP codes, CVV, or behavioral verification) with an automated electronic system using NFC circuits. This substitution eliminates the need for user interaction during authentication, thereby improving ease of operation while maintaining reliability through automated association verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If detailed behavioral models are built for each user, then fraud detection capability improves, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the core authentication requirement from complex behavioral models and reduces it to a single key factor: verifying the association between the processing device and the vehicle. By taking out only the essential verification element (device-vehicle association via NFC), the system maintains fraud detection capability while dramatically reducing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the authentication process into distinct components: NFC circuit identification, code comparison, and association determination. This segmentation allows the system to achieve reliable fraud detection through a series of simple, manageable steps rather than requiring a single complex behavioral analysis system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If multiple authentication factors are required, then security improves, but transaction time and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidtransaction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-storing the vehicle registration plate code in the NFC circuit of the processing device. During the transaction, the system only needs to retrieve and compare this pre-stored code with the current vehicle's plate code, eliminating the need for multiple authentication factors and significantly reducing transaction time while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces fraudulent transactions and false positives by ensuring a valid association between the vehicle and processing device, enhancing security and user authentication in payment card transactions, particularly for driverless vehicles and other emerging technologies.

Implementation Method 1

A wireless communication circuit (e.g., Near Field Communication (NFC) circuit) is communicatively coupled to the processing device, the wireless communication circuit including at least one of a wireless communication tag and a wireless communication reader to receive or selectively provide wireless connectivity data from or to the payment area via a wireless communication link

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNear Field Communication (NFC): Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9552578B2Method and system for authentication of payment card transactions
Publication Date: 2017.01.24 MASTERCARD INT INC
  • US9552578B2 patent drawing
  • US9552578B2 patent drawing
  • US9552578B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and a system are provided for authenticating secure payment card transactions and verifying and validating payment card user identities. The method includes determining a numeric or alphanumeric code on a vehicle registration plate of a vehicle (e.g., a driverless vehicle or a drone) bearing a processing device that is approaching a payment area (e.g., a toll road, a refueling station, or a retail store). A wireless communication circuit (e.g., Near Field Communication (NFC) circuit) is communicatively coupled to the processing device. The method also includes determining a numeric or alphanumeric identification of the processing device; comparing the numeric or alphanumeric code on the vehicle registration plate with the numeric or alphanumeric identification of the processing device to determine whether or not an association exists between the vehicle and the processing device; and assessing the determined association to facilitate determining whether a payment transaction using the processing device is valid or invalid (e.g., potential fraud).