NFT Transaction Anchors and Locks for Secure Royalty Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems lack effective mechanisms for managing transactions involving non-fungible tokens (NFTs), particularly in ensuring royalty payments and preventing fraudulent activities such as Ponzi structures, while enabling secure access and transfer of digital content.

Innovation Solution

Implementing anchor and lock mechanisms within NFT platforms to verify token compatibility, manage access rights, and enforce royalty payments, along with blockchain-based systems to detect and prevent fraudulent activities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If anchor and lock mechanisms are implemented to verify token compatibility and manage access rights, then transaction security and reliability are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction securityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the security mechanism into two distinct components: an 'anchor' embedded in the application that contains a verifier and application identifier, and a 'lock' associated with the token that governs access to content. This segmentation allows each component to have a specific function, improving reliability while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The anchor acts as an intermediary between the application and the token verification process. It contains a verifier that checks token compatibility and an identifier that links the token to the specific application, enabling secure transaction management without requiring direct complex interactions between all system components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If blockchain-based systems are used to detect and prevent fraudulent activities, then reliability and fraud prevention are improved, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud prevention capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback mechanisms where transaction information is logged and can be assessed by application authorities. The lock mechanism monitors access attempts and can trigger royalty payments or security actions based on detected fraudulent patterns, creating a feedback loop that improves fraud prevention while maintaining manageable system complexity through automated responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of energy

If automatic royalty payment mechanisms are implemented, then loss of revenue to creators is prevented, but device complexity and transaction processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue loss preventionVSAvoidtransaction processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lock is pre-configured with royalty payment terms and automatically executes payment transactions when specific conditions are met, such as when a token is accessed or transferred. This preliminary setup eliminates the need for manual royalty tracking and payment initiation, preventing revenue loss while automating the process to manage complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service royalty payments where the smart contract or lock mechanism automatically handles the payment process without requiring external intervention. The transaction system itself performs the royalty distribution based on embedded rules, reducing the need for additional complex payment management infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If detailed transaction logging and verification mechanisms are implemented, then measurement precision and transaction transparency are improved, but loss of time and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction tracking accuracyVSAvoidtransaction processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential verification information into the anchor (verifier and application identifier) and lock (access governance and royalty terms) structures. This extraction allows for precise transaction tracking of critical elements without logging excessive detail, maintaining measurement precision while reducing processing time by focusing on key transaction attributes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20260024078A1Systems and Methods for Transaction Management in NFT-Directed Environments
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 ARTEMA LABS INC
  • US20260024078A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024078A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024078A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and techniques to facilitate transaction management in NFT-directed environments within an NFT platform are illustrated. One embodiment embeds an anchor into an application for utilizing tokens, wherein the anchor includes a verifier and an identifier unique to the application. The method verifies, using the verifier of the anchor, that a token is compatible with the application. The method imports the token into the application. The method associates the anchor with a lock, wherein the lock governs access to content of the token. The method identifies a completed transaction that changes access rights associated with the token, wherein the transaction is identified using at least one of information included in the anchor and information included in the lock. The method transmits, to a party to the transaction, a lock value, wherein the lock value, when detected by the lock, allows the party to access the token.