NFT Retirement System for Digital Asset Scarcity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional NFT minting and distribution schemes fail to protect the value of existing NFTs as their proliferation increases, leading to dilution of both objective and subjective value, and do not incentivize the relinquishment of existing NFTs for recycling or retirement.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for NFT retirement that rewards collectors for relinquishing NFTs by enhancing their scarcity, allowing NFT owners to participate in collaborative activities and relinquish their NFTs, which are then recycled or 'burned', thereby maintaining and enhancing the value of remaining NFTs in circulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional NFT minting and distribution schemes are used, then NFTs can be freely bought, sold, or traded, but the value of existing NFTs is diluted as more NFTs become available

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNFT exchange flexibilityVSAvoidNFT supply
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements NFT retirement mechanisms where existing NFTs are intentionally discarded from circulation through burning or recycling processes. This controlled discarding reduces the total supply of NFTs while maintaining the ability to create and exchange new NFTs, thereby resolving the contradiction between exchange flexibility and supply quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic supply management where the NFT ecosystem can adapt its total supply through time-based retirement schedules, event-driven burning, or community-voted decisions. This dynamic approach allows the system to maintain flexibility in NFT exchange while actively managing supply to prevent dilution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If more NFTs are minted and distributed, then accessibility and participation increase, but the subjective value of existing NFTs decreases due to perceived rarity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNFT accessibilityVSAvoidNFT value stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where NFT holders receive information about retirement programs, burning events, or recycling opportunities. This feedback loop enables holders to understand the system's value preservation efforts, maintaining their perception of rarity and value stability even as new NFTs are minted and distributed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs preliminary actions such as pre-announcing retirement schedules, pre-defining burn conditions, or pre-establishing recycling programs. These preliminary measures create expectations of future supply reduction, which can stabilize current NFT values while maintaining accessibility for new participants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If existing NFTs are retired or burned, then scarcity and value of remaining NFTs enhance, but the quantity of NFTs in circulation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNFT value stabilityVSAvoidNFT circulation supply
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent distinguishes between permanent discarding (burning) and recovering (recycling) of NFTs. Burning permanently removes NFTs from circulation to enhance scarcity and value, while recycling allows retired NFTs to be transformed and re-enter circulation under new conditions. This selective approach balances value stability with manageable supply reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters of NFT existence through retirement mechanisms, transforming NFTs from active circulation to retired state, and potentially back to circulation through recycling. These parameter changes (active/inactive, burned/recycled) allow the system to control effective supply while maintaining the total number of NFTs that have ever existed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20230410066A1System and method for non-fungible token economy sinks
Publication Date: 2023.12.21 DISNEY ENTERPRISES INC
  • US20230410066A1 patent drawing
  • US20230410066A1 patent drawing
  • US20230410066A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a hardware processor and a memory storing software code. The hardware processor executes the software code to determine how many users are present at a location at a starting time of an NFT acquisition event, identify, based on how many users are present, a collaborative activity for the users, the collaborative activity requiring relinquishment of a plurality of NFTs, and communicate the collaborative activity to the users. The hardware processor further executes the software code to verify that the collaborative activity has been completed, and provide, in response to verifying, one or more new NFT(s) for distribution to at least one of the users, wherein (i) a value associated with the new NFT(s) exceeds a value of the NFTs relinquished, or (ii) a number of the NFTs relinquished exceeds a number of the new NFT(s).