Nickel-Based Cladding Alloy for Cast Iron Repair

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cast iron repair alloys, such as those containing Inconel 690 with added lanthanum, face issues with hardness mismatch between the repair material and the base material, leading to potential brittleness and cracking due to carbide precipitation, and require additional heat treatment steps, which increase costs and complexity.

Innovation Solution

A nickel-based alloy with specific compositions of chromium, iron, silicon, boron, and carbon, ranging from 6.2% to 9.3% chromium, 3.0% to 4.5% iron, 1.4% to 2.15% silicon, 0.5% to 0.8% boron, and 0.1% carbon, is used for cladding, ensuring a hardness match with the base material and minimizing carbide precipitation, thus reducing the risk of cracking and eliminating the need for pre-heating and post-annealing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If Inconel 690 alloy with lanthanum is used for welding repair, then cracking of welded joints during cooling is prevented, but hardness mismatch between repair material and base material causes abrasion of repaired component or mating parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrack prevention in welded jointsVSAvoidhardness mismatch causing abrasion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the chemical composition parameters of the filler material by adding boron (0.05-1.0 wt%) and controlling carbon content (0.01-0.5 wt%), chromium (2.0-10.0 wt%), and other elements to adjust the hardness of the repaired area to match the base material, eliminating the hardness mismatch problem while maintaining crack prevention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If Inconel 690 alloy is used for welding repair, then welded joint integrity is improved, but carbide precipitation at the interface makes the interface brittle leading to further cracking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelded joint integrityVSAvoidinterface brittleness due to carbide precipitation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent controls carbon content (0.01-0.5 wt%) and adds boron (0.05-1.0 wt%) to modify the chemical parameters of the filler material, preventing carbide precipitation at the interface and eliminating interface brittleness while maintaining welded joint integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of repair

If conventional welding repair methods are used, then cracked portions can be repaired, but additional heat treatment is required after welding to relieve stresses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrack repair capabilityVSAvoidadditional heat treatment process steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The filler material composition is designed to inherently relieve welding stresses without requiring external heat treatment processes, making the repair material itself perform the stress relief function that would otherwise require separate equipment and processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If repair material with different hardness than base material is used, then crack prevention is achieved, but the repaired component or mating parts are abraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrack preventionVSAvoidabrasion of repaired component
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent precisely controls the chemical composition parameters including boron (0.05-1.0 wt%), carbon (0.01-0.5 wt%), chromium (2.0-10.0 wt%), and other elements to achieve hardness matching between the repaired area and base material, eliminating abrasion while maintaining crack prevention capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The alloy achieves a Rockwell hardness comparable to the base material, reduces carbide formation, and eliminates interfacial cracks, enhancing the mechanical strength and fatigue life of repaired components while simplifying the repair process by reducing heat input and eliminating the need for additional heat treatment steps.

Implementation Method 1

The alloy may include on a weight basis, about 6.2% to about 9.3% of chromium (Cr), about 3.0% to about 4.5% of iron (Fe), about 1.4% to about 2.15% of silicon (Si), about 0.5% to about 0.8% of boron (B), about 0.1% of carbon (C), and a balance of nickel (Ni) and incidental impurities

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolid solution strengthening: Solid Solution Strengthening

Implementation Method 2

The disclosed alloy of the '446 patent may not prevent precipitation of carbides at the interface of the weld material and the base material of the component. Carbide precipitation may cause the interface between the weld material and the base material to become brittle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCarbide precipitation control: Precipitation

Implementation Method 3

Components welded using the method disclosed in the '446 patent may also require additional heat treatment after the welding process to relieve stresses in the component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat treatment: Heat Treatment

Data Source

PatentUS9975208B1Alloy for cast iron repair
Publication Date: 2018.05.22 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US9975208B1 patent drawing
  • US9975208B1 patent drawing
  • US9975208B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An alloy for cladding cast iron is disclosed. The alloy may include on a weight basis, about 6.2% to about 9.3% of chromium (Cr), about 3.0% to about 4.5% of iron (Fe), about 1.4% to about 2.15% of silicon (Si), about 0.5% to about 0.8% of boron (B), about 0.1% of carbon (C), and a balance of nickel (Ni) and incidental impurities.