NiFeX Ternary OER Catalysts Without Metallic Support Layers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high cost of noble-metal catalysts in proton-exchange membrane (PEM)-based electrolyzers limits the widespread adoption of hydrogen production via electrolysis, and while non-noble metal catalysts like NiFe show promise, the role of additional metals like cobalt in improving oxygen evolution reaction (OER) activity remains debated.

Innovation Solution

Development of ternary catalysts comprising nickel (Ni), iron (Fe), and a third metal (X) such as cobalt (Co), zinc (Zn), aluminum (Al), or manganese (Mn) or chromium (Cr), prepared in specific molar ratios and reduced in the presence of aniline to form oxides and alloyed in argon, creating a free-standing catalyst that eliminates the need for a metallic support layer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If noble-metal catalysts are used in PEM-based electrolyzers, then high OER activity is achieved, but the cost becomes prohibitively high

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveOER activityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive noble-metal catalysts with cheaper non-noble metal catalysts (Ni, Fe, Co, Mn, Zn, Al, Cr) that can be disposed of or regenerated more economically. The use of abundant earth elements substitutes critical expensive materials while maintaining acceptable performance through optimized composition ratios and surface area engineering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite catalyst structures combining multiple non-noble metals (e.g., NiFe, NiCo, NiMn) to achieve synergistic effects that mimic or exceed noble-metal performance. The composite nature allows each metal to contribute its unique properties, creating a cost-effective alternative through material synergy rather than relying on single expensive elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If non-noble metal catalysts like NiFe are used, then cost is reduced, but the role of additional metals like cobalt in improving OER activity remains debated and performance is inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoidOER activity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent systematically varies compositional parameters (metal ratios, oxidation states, particle sizes) to optimize OER activity. By controlling the atomic percentages and oxidation states of metals in the catalyst, the patent achieves consistent high performance across different non-noble metal combinations, resolving the inconsistency problem through parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates catalysts with non-uniform metal distributions and varying local compositions to optimize activity at specific active sites. The heterogeneous distribution of metals within the catalyst structure allows different regions to perform specialized functions, with highly active sites concentrated where multiple metals interface, thereby achieving high OER activity reliably.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Stability of the object's composition

If traditional catalysts with metallic support layers are used, then structural stability is achieved, but the cost increases due to expensive metal supports

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the expensive metallic support layer from traditional catalyst structures, creating free-standing catalysts where the active non-noble metal material itself forms the structural framework. This extraction eliminates the need for costly support materials like noble-metal meshes while the catalyst material's own structural properties provide sufficient stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The non-noble metal catalyst material serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides catalytic activity for OER, structural stability as a free-standing component, and electrical conductivity. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate support layers, as the catalyst material itself fulfills all necessary roles, reducing cost while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If ternary catalysts with optimized metal ratios are synthesized, then OER activity improves, but the manufacturing process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveOER activityVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent prepares precursor materials with pre-determined metal ratios and distributions before the final catalyst synthesis. By controlling the composition of starting materials and using sequential deposition or impregnation methods, the desired ternary metal composition is achieved in a systematic, reproducible manner that reduces manufacturing complexity despite the multi-metal nature of the catalyst.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The ternary catalysts demonstrate improved OER activity, reducing the operating potential of electrolyzer cells and lowering costs by eliminating the need for expensive metal supports, thus enhancing the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of hydrogen and oxygen production in electrolysis.

Implementation Method 1

the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and cathodic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) catalysts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxygen evolution reaction (OER): Electrolysis

Implementation Method 2

Ternary catalysts comprised of Ni, Fe, and a third metal X... demonstrate improved OER activity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

reducing corresponding salts of each of the metals Ni, Fe and X in the presence of aniline to yield respective oxides, hydroxides, and/or oxyhydroxides

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 4

the reduction in the presence of aniline is used to limit particle size of the oxides, hydroxides, and/or oxyhydroxides

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectParticle size limitation:

Implementation Method 5

alloying a mixture of same in argon to yield the catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAlloying:

Implementation Method 6

membrane-based electrolyzers that were more compact, and scalable

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMembrane separation: Semipermeable Membrane

Data Source

PatentUS20230395816A1Ternary catalysts for oxygen evolution reactions
Publication Date: 2023.12.07 ADVENT TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS INC
  • US20230395816A1 patent drawing
  • US20230395816A1 patent drawing
  • US20230395816A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the invention provide ternary catalysts for oxygen evolution reactions comprised of Ni, Fe, and a third metal X, where X comprises any of Co, Zn, Al, Mn, or Cr. Still other aspects of the invention provide such ternary catalysts, where the molar ratios in preparation of the catalysts of Ni, Fe and X are any of 8:1:1, 7:2:1, 7:1:2, 6:3:1, 6:2:2, or 6:1:3 where the first number refers to nickel; the second number, iron; and, the third number, the metal X. Further aspects of the invention provide such ternary catalysts prepared by reducing corresponding salts of each of the metals Ni, Fe and X in the presence of aniline to yield respective oxides, hydroxides, and/or oxyhydroxides of each of those metals and, then, alloying a mixture of same in argon to yield the catalyst.