Nitrided Damper Spring Composition for Higher Fatigue Limit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current techniques for improving the fatigue limit of damper springs focus on increasing the strength and hardness of the steel material, but this approach has limitations, and there is a need for a different method to enhance the fatigue limit without relying solely on strength and hardness correlations.

Innovation Solution

A damper spring with a chemical composition of C: 0.53 to 0.59%, Si: 2.51 to 2.90%, Mn: 0.70 to 0.85%, P: 0.020% or less, S: 0.020% or less, Cr: 1.40 to 1.70%, Mo: 0.17 to 0.53%, V: 0.23 to 0.33%, Cu: 0.050% or less, Ni: 0.050% or less, Al: 0.0050% or less, Ti: 0.050% or less, N: 0.0070% or less, and Nb: 0 to 0.020%, featuring a high number density of nano-sized V-based precipitates (500 to 8000 pieces/μm2) to increase the fatigue limit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the strength and hardness of the steel material are increased to improve the fatigue limit, then the fatigue limit is improved, but the core portion hardness becomes excessively high which may reduce ductility and increase manufacturing difficulty

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefatigue limitVSAvoidcore portion hardness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating distinct regions with different properties: the outer layer receives a nitrided treatment to form a hard, fatigue-resistant surface layer, while the core portion maintains lower hardness through controlled composition (lower C, higher Si) to preserve ductility. This spatial differentiation of material properties resolves the contradiction between needing high fatigue limit (requiring high surface hardness) and needing manufacturability (requiring core ductility).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent effectively creates a composite structure at the material level: the nitrided outer layer (high hardness, high fatigue resistance) combined with the softer core portion (good ductility, easier manufacturing). The specific chemical composition design creates two functional zones within a single component, allowing simultaneous achievement of high fatigue limit and manufacturability without requiring separate parts or assemblies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If nitriding treatment is performed to increase the fatigue limit, then the fatigue limit is improved, but the treatment time and process complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefatigue limitVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-configuring the chemical composition before nitriding: the core portion is designed with specific element contents (C: 0.53-0.59%, Si: 2.51-2.90%, Mn: 0.70-0.85%) that prepare the material to respond optimally to subsequent nitriding treatment. This preliminary composition design ensures that the nitriding process produces the desired hard outer layer with appropriate depth and uniformity, reducing the need for complex multi-stage nitriding procedures or post-treatment adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes by precisely controlling the chemical composition parameters (especially C, Si, Mn, Cr, Mo, V contents) to optimize the nitriding response. The specific composition range ensures appropriate carbon equivalent for nitriding hardenability while maintaining core ductility, and the controlled alloying elements facilitate uniform nitrogen diffusion and appropriate precipitate formation during nitriding, simplifying the treatment process while maximizing fatigue limit improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the chemical composition is optimized for high strength to improve fatigue limit, then the fatigue limit is improved, but the cost of materials and processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefatigue limitVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the chemical composition parameters to achieve the best balance between performance and cost: the carbon content is controlled at 0.53-0.59% (moderate level providing sufficient hardenability without excessive cost), silicon is elevated to 2.51-2.90% (provides strength and nitriding resistance at reasonable cost), and alloying elements (Mn: 0.70-0.85%, Cr: 1.40-1.70%, Mo: 0.17-0.53%, V: 0.23-0.33%) are precisely specified to provide maximum fatigue limit improvement per unit cost. This parameter optimization resolves the contradiction by achieving high fatigue limit through cost-effective composition design rather than expensive alternative approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The approach results in a damper spring with an excellent fatigue limit, even when the core portion hardness is low, demonstrating a high fatigue limit ratio and improved durability.

Implementation Method 1

in the core portion, a number density of V-based precipitates having a maximum diameter ranging from 2 to 10 nm is 500 to 8000 pieces/μm2

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrecipitation hardening: Precipitation Hardening

Implementation Method 2

a nitrided layer formed in an outer layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNitriding: Nitriding

Data Source

PatentUS12181012B2Damper spring
Publication Date: 2024.12.31 NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION
  • US12181012B2 patent drawing
  • US12181012B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A damper spring having an excellent fatigue limit is provided. A damper spring according to the present embodiment includes a nitrided layer formed in an outer layer, and a core portion that is further inward than the nitrided layer. The chemical composition of the core portion consists of, in mass %, C: 0.53 to 0.59%, Si: 2.51 to 2.90%, Mn: 0.70 to 0.85%, P: 0.020% or less, S: 0.020% or less, Cr: 1.40 to 1.70%, Mo: 0.17 to 0.53%, V: 0.23 to 0.33%, Cu: 0.050% or less, Ni: 0.050% or less, Al: 0.0050% or less, Ti: 0.050% or less, N: 0.0070% or less, and Nb: 0 to 0.020%, with the balance being Fe and impurities. In the core portion, a number density of V-based precipitates having a maximum diameter ranging from 2 to 10 nm is 500 to 8000 pieces/μm2.