Natural Language Code Translation for Error Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Code generation systems based on natural language processing and generative AI often produce faulty code with syntax errors or misinterpret user input, making it difficult for inexperienced users to recognize and correct issues.

Innovation Solution

The system generates a natural language translation of the code, provides a graphical user interface for reviewing and modifying the translation, and allows users to submit updates back to the code generation system, incorporating feedback to improve code generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If code generation systems use NLP and genAI to generate code from natural language input, then ease of operation is improved for novice users, but reliability deteriorates due to syntax errors and misinterpretation of user input

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of code generationVSAvoidcode quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates a natural language translation of the generated code and presents it to the user for review. The user can provide feedback by modifying the NL translation or the original NL input, and the system uses this feedback to regenerate corrected code. This feedback loop enables novice users to verify code correctness and correct errors without needing programming expertise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The natural language translation serves as an intermediary between the code generation system and the user. Instead of requiring users to directly read and understand programming code, the system translates the code into natural language explanations that users can easily comprehend and verify, bridging the gap between technical code and user understanding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the system generates code directly without translation, then productivity is improved, but difficulty of detecting and measuring errors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode generation speedVSAvoiderror detection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The natural language translation acts as an intermediary layer that makes code errors detectable to users. By translating code into natural language explanations, the system enables users to understand what the code is supposed to do and easily identify discrepancies between expected and actual behavior, making error detection accessible to non-programmers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system separates the code generation function from the code verification function. Code is generated automatically at high speed, while verification is handled separately through natural language translation and user review. This segmentation allows each function to optimize independently - generation for speed and verification for accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If users cannot modify the generated code directly, then device complexity is reduced, but ease of repair deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interface complexityVSAvoidcode correction capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The natural language translation serves as an intermediary that simplifies code modification for users. Instead of requiring users to edit code syntax directly, they can modify the natural language translation or the original NL input, and the system automatically regenerates the corrected code. This maintains simplicity while enabling effective code repair.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides a feedback mechanism where users review the NL translation, identify errors, and provide corrections. The system then uses these corrections to regenerate the code, creating a simple yet effective feedback loop that enables code repair without requiring users to understand or edit the code directly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250103308A1Automatic validation of computer-generated code method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.03.27 YAHOO ASSETS LLC
  • US20250103308A1 patent drawing
  • US20250103308A1 patent drawing
  • US20250103308A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for automatically generating a natural language (NL) translation of computer code are disclosed. In one embodiment, a computer-implemented method is disclosed comprising receiving, from a user, a code translation request in connection with code generated by a code generation system based on natural language (NL) input, analyzing the computer-generated code and generating a natural language (NL) translation of the computer-generated code based on the analysis, generating a graphical user interface (GUI) comprising the NL input, the NL translation of the computer-generated code and GUI control elements for receiving input from the user in connection with at least one of the NL input and the NL translation; causing the GUI to be displayed at a client device of the user, and receiving input from the user via at least one GUI control element and causing performance of at least one operation in response to the input.