NLG Template GUI for Grammatical Localization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing natural language generation (NLG) technologies face challenges in efficiently and accurately generating grammatical and natural language responses in target languages, requiring significant resources and expertise, often resulting in flawed templates that can prolong or terminate interactions between humans and automated systems.

Innovation Solution

A graphical user interface (GUI) is developed to facilitate the efficient generation of target language NLG templates by allowing users, including non-linguists, to interact with curated source language templates and primitives, enabling the selection and scoring of target language primitives based on their relevance and historical usage, which helps in generating accurate and grammatically correct output examples.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If generative machine learning models are used to generate natural language output, then the system can provide dynamic and flexible responses, but the output may lack grammaticality and naturalness, leading to user confusion and prolonged interactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse flexibilityVSAvoidgrammaticality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments natural language generation into two distinct components: a generative model that creates diverse response content and a separate template-based system that ensures grammatical correctness. This segmentation allows each component to specialize - the generative model provides flexibility while the template system guarantees grammaticality and naturalness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If generative models are trained for multiple languages, then language coverage is improved, but the resource intensity and time required for data accumulation and labeling increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanguage coverageVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of training separate generative models for each language, the system copies and adapts proven NLG templates from source languages to target languages. This copying approach leverages existing linguistically validated templates, avoiding the time-consuming process of accumulating and labeling training data for each new language while maintaining high-quality grammatical output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Manufacturing precision

If NLG templates are manually crafted for target languages by computational linguists, then template accuracy is improved, but the resource intensity and time required for template creation increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemplate accuracyVSAvoidtemplate creation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-crafting and validating NLG templates in source languages where linguistic expertise is already invested. These pre-validated templates are then systematically adapted to target languages through automated processes, eliminating the need for computational linguists to manually craft templates for each target language while preserving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary translation and adaptation layer between source language templates and target language output. This intermediary process handles the complex linguistic transformations automatically, allowing templates to be created once in source languages and efficiently adapted to multiple target languages without requiring expert manual intervention for each language.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If machine translation is used to translate system responses from source language to target language, then localization speed is improved, but the target language output may become non-grammatical and unnatural

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocalization speedVSAvoidgrammaticality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces NLG templates as an intermediary structure between machine translation and final output. Instead of directly translating raw generated text, the system translates into template structures that inherently enforce grammatical rules and natural language patterns of the target language, ensuring both speed and grammaticality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of grammar enforcement from being a post-processing constraint to being an inherent structural property of the output. By organizing translation output to fit predefined grammatical templates, the system automatically ensures grammaticality and naturalness without requiring additional validation steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12182526B2Interactive graphical interfaces for efficient localization of natural language generation responses, resulting in natural and grammatical target language output
Publication Date: 2024.12.31 GOOGLE LLC
  • US12182526B2 patent drawing
  • US12182526B2 patent drawing
  • US12182526B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Implementations relate to effectively localizing system responses, that include dynamic information, to target language(s), such that the system responses are grammatical and/or natural in the target language(s). Some of those implementations relate to various techniques for resource efficient generation of templates for a target language. Some versions of those implementations relate to resource efficient generation of target language natural language generation (NLG) templates and, more particularly, to techniques that enable a human user to generate a target language NLG template more efficiently and/or with greater accuracy. The more efficient target language NLG template generation enables less utilization of various client device resources and/or can mitigate the risk of flawed NLG templates being provided for live use in one or more systems.