Generative Language Model Product Description Accuracy via NLP Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current generative language models used for generating product descriptions in e-commerce struggle with accuracy, failing to identify and modify errors or inaccuracies, and do not provide meaningful alternatives to words in the descriptions, making it time-consuming for merchants to create precise product descriptions.

Innovation Solution

A system that employs a natural language processor and a generative language model to identify candidate words for modification in product descriptions, offering alternative phrases and allowing merchants to customize descriptions through a user interface, with the option to incorporate image analysis for accuracy and rearrange sections for better presentation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a generative language model is used to automatically generate product descriptions, then productivity is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to inaccuracies in generated content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct description generation speedVSAvoidproduct description accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by using a natural language processor to analyze the generated product description and identify candidate words for modification. The processor provides feedback on which words may be inaccurate or could be improved, allowing the system to iteratively refine the output and improve accuracy while maintaining automated generation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

A natural language processor acts as an intermediary between the generative language model and the final product description. This intermediary component analyzes the generated text, identifies candidate words for modification based on various criteria, and provides alternative suggestions, thereby improving accuracy without requiring manual review of the entire description.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If a generative language model generates product descriptions with high accuracy, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional processing components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct description accuracyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the product description into individual words and identifies specific candidate words for modification rather than analyzing the entire text uniformly. This segmentation allows the natural language processor to focus computational resources on specific words that may benefit from modification, improving accuracy while managing complexity through targeted analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different processing quality to different parts of the product description by identifying specific candidate words for modification based on local context and criteria. Not all words receive the same level of analysis - only those identified as candidates for modification undergo alternative generation and merchant review, allowing high accuracy where needed while reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If the system provides multiple alternative words for modification, then manufacturing precision is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to increased merchant workload

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct description accuracyVSAvoidmerchant editing effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides alternatives for only some words in the product description - specifically those identified as candidate words for modification - rather than requiring merchants to review or edit the entire description. This partial action approach maintains accuracy by focusing on words that need improvement while reducing merchant workload by excluding words that are already satisfactory.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The natural language processor automatically performs the initial analysis and identification of candidate words for modification, serving itself to filter and prioritize which words need merchant attention. This self-service capability reduces the burden on merchants by pre-processing the text and presenting only the most relevant modification opportunities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Manufacturing precision

If the system processes the entire product description for modifications, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to extended processing duration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct description accuracyVSAvoiddescription processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the product description processing by identifying only specific candidate words for modification rather than uniformly processing the entire text. This segmentation significantly reduces processing time by focusing computational resources on a subset of words that are most likely to benefit from modification, while maintaining accuracy in those critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial processing by analyzing and providing alternatives for only certain words in the product description - those identified as candidates for modification - rather than processing every word. This partial action approach maintains necessary accuracy while dramatically reducing the time required compared to comprehensive full-text processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20230259692A1Systems and methods for computer generation of a modifiable product description
Publication Date: 2023.08.17 SHOPIFY INC
  • US20230259692A1 patent drawing
  • US20230259692A1 patent drawing
  • US20230259692A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Generative language models are able to generate a sequence of text that may closely mimic a native human speaker's own generated text. However, technical challenges exist when implementing a generative language model for generating product descriptions. The model may output certain inaccuracies due to the predictive nature of generating the output. Further, the model does not have the ability to identify words from the product description that a merchant may want to modify, nor the ability to provide meaningful alternatives to such words. In some embodiments, a natural language processor might be built and/or trained using classification data. The natural language processor may identify one or more words and/or phrases in a product description as a candidate for modification. The product description might then be displayed on a merchant-facing user interface with an indication that the candidate for modification may be modified.