NLP Parse Tree Traversal for Entity-Temporal Relation Inference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current natural language processing systems face ambiguities in associating temporal elements with entity elements, such as dates with medical procedures or medications, due to the limitations of existing ontologies and representation methods.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that organizes text as a natural language processing (NLP) parse tree, traverses the tree to concatenate nodes, and generates relation types between entity and temporal elements, thereby clarifying their associations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing ontologies are used to represent knowledge relationships, then the system can manage semantic concepts, but ambiguities remain in associating temporal elements with entity elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassociation accuracyVSAvoidtemporal relationship clarity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the text processing into distinct phases: parsing the text into a parse tree, identifying temporal and entity elements, traversing the parse tree to find relationships, and generating relation types. This segmentation allows each phase to focus on specific aspects of the problem, improving overall accuracy in resolving temporal associations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The parse tree serves as an intermediary structure between the raw text and the final relation type generation. It organizes the text into hierarchical nodes that facilitate systematic traversal and relationship identification, mediating between the ambiguity of natural language and the precision required for accurate temporal association.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If ontologies are designed to be comprehensive, then more knowledge can be represented, but they become more complex and harder to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveontology coverageVSAvoidontology structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal approach that works across multiple domains (medical, legal, financial) by using a general parse tree traversal methodology. The same core algorithm can identify temporal relationships in different contexts without requiring domain-specific complex ontology structures, achieving versatility through a unified approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the text itself to generate the relationship information through parse tree traversal, rather than relying on pre-defined complex ontology entries. The text's own structure provides the guidance needed for relationship identification, making the system self-sufficient and reducing dependency on complex external knowledge bases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If the system processes text to generate relation types, then association accuracy improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelation type accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary parsing of the text into a parse tree structure before attempting to identify temporal relationships. This preliminary organization of the text data facilitates faster and more accurate relationship detection during the subsequent traversal phase, as the structured format eliminates the need for re-processing the entire text.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and identifies only the relevant temporal elements and entity elements from the text, focusing the relationship detection algorithm only on these extracted components rather than processing the entire text uniformly. This extraction approach reduces processing time while maintaining high accuracy for the critical relationship identification task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS11373037B2Inferring relation types between temporal elements and entity elements
Publication Date: 2022.06.28 MERATIVE US LP
  • US11373037B2 patent drawing
  • US11373037B2 patent drawing
  • US11373037B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples described herein provide a computer-implemented method that includes receiving, by a processing device, the span of text, the span of text comprising a plurality of elements including at least an entity element and a temporal element. The method further includes organizing, by the processing device, the span of text as a natural language processing (NLP) parse tree. The method further includes traversing, by the processing device, the NLP parse tree by concatenating individual nodes of the span of text to generate the relation type between the entity element and the temporal element. The method further includes associating, by the processing device, the entity element, the relation type, and the temporal element together.