NLP Release Note Mapping for Code Revision Impact Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional software update packages often include inaccurate or incomplete release notes, leading to discrepancies between the actual software changes and the documented updates, which can result in inefficiencies and potential compatibility issues.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a natural language processing engine to parse release notes and compare them with actual software changes, generating a component-level data map to identify discrepancies and perform remedial actions, such as alerts or preventing updates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If automated natural language processing is implemented to detect source code discrepancies, then measurement precision of update accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate accuracy detectionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system comprising a natural language processing engine and a code analysis engine that act as mediators between the software update package and the verification process. The NLP engine processes release notes to extract expected changes, while the code analysis engine compares actual source code modifications. This intermediary layered architecture enables accurate discrepancy detection without requiring direct complex integration between all system components, thus resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive source code analysis is performed to ensure accuracy, then reliability of update information is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate information accuracyVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing automated natural language processing and code comparison operations before the software update is deployed to production environments. The system pre-identifies discrepancies between release notes and actual source code changes, generating verification reports in advance. This preliminary verification ensures reliability of update information while minimizing time loss during actual deployment, as the expensive verification process is completed beforehand rather than during live operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If automated discrepancy detection is implemented, then productivity of update verification is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification efficiencyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the verification system to automatically perform discrepancy detection without requiring manual intervention from developers or quality assurance personnel. The natural language processing engine autonomously parses release notes, the code analysis engine automatically compares source code modifications, and the system generates verification reports independently. This automated self-service approach dramatically improves verification productivity while the modular architecture keeps device complexity manageable by eliminating the need for complex manual verification workflows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12487811B2Natural language processing engine for component level data mapping and code revision impact analysis
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US12487811B2 patent drawing
  • US12487811B2 patent drawing
  • US12487811B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, computer program products, and methods are provided for code revision impact analysis. The method includes generating a system map based on data received from a plurality of network devices; receiving a data transmission including a text file; processing the text file via a natural language processing engine, where an output of the natural language processing engine comprises a plurality of expected updates; determining, based on the system map, at least one downstream effect of the plurality of expected updates; and performing a remedial action.