NLU Intent Clarification via Dual Threshold Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Natural language understanding (NLU) systems face challenges in accurately identifying candidate intents that are 'close' to satisfying a threshold likelihood value, leading to less accurate natural language processing.

Innovation Solution

The system processes user queries using an NLU model to generate candidate intents and intent scores, and determines whether the intent score satisfies a threshold likelihood value. If not, it checks an additional threshold value to assess if the intent score is 'close' enough, and performs further analysis or user querying to determine intent correspondence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the system uses a strict threshold likelihood value to determine intent correspondence, then the decision-making process is simple and fast, but the accuracy of identifying candidate intents is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of intent identificationVSAvoidcomplexity of threshold evaluation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the threshold evaluation into multiple segments: a primary threshold for clear matches and a secondary threshold for borderline cases. This segmentation allows the system to handle different confidence levels differently, improving overall accuracy while maintaining manageable complexity through structured decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by performing additional analysis only on cases that fall within the secondary threshold range, rather than applying exhaustive analysis to all cases. This selective approach improves accuracy for borderline cases while avoiding unnecessary complexity for clear-cut situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Measurement precision

If the system performs additional analysis for intent scores close to the threshold, then the accuracy of NLU improves, but the computing resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of NLUVSAvoidcomputing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs additional analysis only partially - specifically for intent scores that fall within the secondary threshold range but not for scores that clearly meet or fail the primary threshold. This selective application of additional analysis improves NLU accuracy for borderline cases while conserving computing resources for clear-cut cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of threshold sensitivity by introducing a secondary threshold that is closer to the primary threshold. This parameter adjustment allows the system to identify and process only those cases that require additional analysis, optimizing the balance between accuracy and resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the system retraines the NLU model frequently to improve accuracy, then the NLU performance improves, but the time and resources required for model maintenance increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNLU model accuracyVSAvoidtime for model retraining
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by establishing a multi-threshold evaluation framework in advance that proactively identifies borderline cases requiring additional analysis. This preliminary structure improves NLU accuracy without requiring frequent model retraining, as the system is pre-configured to handle uncertain cases through additional analysis pathways.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the threshold evaluation process to determine when additional analysis is needed. By monitoring intent scores against both primary and secondary thresholds, the system receives feedback that triggers selective additional analysis only when necessary, improving accuracy while minimizing the need for frequent model retraining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12204569B2Natural language understanding clarifications
Publication Date: 2025.01.21 GOOGLE LLC
  • US12204569B2 patent drawing
  • US12204569B2 patent drawing
  • US12204569B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are disclosed that enable clarifying whether a user query corresponds to a candidate intent when an intent score (indicating the probability the user query corresponds to the candidate intent) fails to satisfy a threshold likelihood value but is “close” to satisfying the threshold likelihood value. For example, the intent score can fail to satisfy the threshold likelihood value but can satisfy an additional threshold likelihood value. Various implementations include generating the candidate intent and corresponding intent score by processing a natural language user query using a natural language understanding (NLU) model.