Nuclear Medicine Imaging Rotor Tension Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Nuclear Medicine Imaging devices face challenges in efficiently controlling the movement and tension of rotating parts, such as the rotor and extendable arms, which affects the accuracy and reliability of imaging processes.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a rotor driving assembly with a flat open belt and a tensioning system controlled by a controller, along with a linear drive system using bidirectional motors and encoders for precise movement and positioning, ensures accurate and controlled rotation and extension of scanning units.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a traditional rotor driving system is used, then the structure is simple, but the positioning precision and tension control are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning precisionVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical positioning systems with an encoder-based feedback system. The encoder measures the actual position of the rotor and provides feedback to the controller, which adjusts the motor output to achieve precise positioning. This substitution of direct mechanical coupling with sensor-based control resolves the contradiction by achieving high positioning precision without requiring overly complex mechanical structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback control system where encoders continuously monitor the position and tension of moving parts, and the controller adjusts motor commands based on this feedback to maintain desired positioning and tension levels. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables precise control while keeping the overall system architecture relatively simple and modular.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If manual tensioning is used, then the device complexity is low, but the reliability and consistency of tension control are poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetension control reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs tension sensors that continuously monitor belt tension and provide feedback to the controller. The controller automatically adjusts motor torque to maintain consistent tension levels, eliminating the variability and unreliability of manual tensioning. This automated feedback control achieves high reliability without requiring complex mechanical tensioning mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment of tension through the feedback loop, where the controller automatically compensates for tension variations without external intervention. The motor system self-regulates to maintain optimal tension based on encoder and sensor feedback, reducing the need for manual adjustment mechanisms and improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If extendable arms are used to improve scanning coverage, then the versatility is improved, but the control of movement and tension becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescanning coverageVSAvoidmovement control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamically adjustable extendable arms that can change their length and position during operation. The motorized extension mechanism allows the arms to adapt to different scanning requirements, improving versatility. The encoder-based position feedback ensures that even as the arms extend or retract, their position remains precisely controlled, maintaining ease of operation despite the added complexity of extendability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Manufacturing precision

If precise positioning systems are implemented, then the image quality improves, but the device complexity and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidmaintenance complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical positioning mechanisms with motorized drives combined with encoder feedback. This substitution reduces the number of mechanical components such as gears, belts, and linkages that would require maintenance, while maintaining high positioning accuracy through electronic control. The modular motor-encoder assemblies are easier to service than traditional mechanical positioning systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3698176B1Moving parts in a nuclear medicine (n-m) imaging system
Publication Date: 2023.10.11 SPECTRUM DYNAMICS MEDICAL LTD
  • EP3698176B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3698176B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3698176B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A Nuclear Medicine (N-M) imaging system including a gantry having a stationary stator and a rotor rotatably mounted on the stator and including detection units. The rotor is driven by a rotor driving assembly including a linear encoder. The detection units mounted on the rotor include scanning columns having one or more Multi-Pixel Photon Counter (MPC) mounted on one or more extendable arm. The gantry also includes flat cables connecting the controller with gantry components, e.g., the scanning column Multi-Pixel Photon Counters (MPC). The scanning columns are pivotably moveable by a scanning column driver system including a rotary encoder.