Neural Network Hardware Co-Design Optimization
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current neural network design methods focus primarily on accuracy, neglecting other critical factors like resource constraints such as cost, energy, and latency, which are essential for optimal performance in practical applications.
Innovation Solution
A computer-implemented method and system that iteratively adjusts neural network and hardware architecture parameters using a gradient-based differentiable function to optimize their combination within specified resource constraints, ensuring an optimal balance between performance and resource usage.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If neural network architecture is optimized for higher accuracy, then model performance improves, but resource consumption (energy, cost, latency) increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent changes the parameters of both neural network architecture and hardware architecture simultaneously through a unified optimization process. By representing hardware architecture choices as differentiable parameters and combining them with neural network parameters in a single loss function, the system can adjust both sets of parameters to achieve optimal accuracy while controlling resource consumption through the differentiable hardware cost model.
2Measurement precision
If neural network architecture is optimized for higher accuracy, then model performance improves, but computational cost increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent creates a universal optimization framework that simultaneously handles both neural network architecture search and hardware architecture selection. The unified loss function serves multiple purposes: optimizing neural network accuracy, controlling hardware cost, and ensuring differentiability. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate optimization processes and enables joint optimization of software and hardware components.
3Measurement precision
If neural network architecture is optimized for higher accuracy, then model performance improves, but latency increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements feedback through the differentiable hardware cost model that provides gradient information about latency and other resource constraints back to the architecture optimization process. The hardware cost function C(h) is designed to be differentiable with respect to hardware parameters, allowing the optimization algorithm to receive feedback on how architectural changes affect latency and adjust the design accordingly to meet timing constraints while maintaining accuracy.
4Measurement precision
If hardware architecture is customized for specific neural network requirements, then performance improves, but device complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent makes the hardware architecture dynamic and adaptable by representing it as a set of parameterizable components that can be automatically configured through the optimization process. Instead of fixed hardware designs, the system uses configurable hardware architectures where parameters such as layer configurations, operation types, and resource allocations can be dynamically adjusted based on the specific neural network requirements and resource constraints, achieving performance optimization without excessive complexity.
Data Source
AI summary
A method for matching neural network layouts to hardware architectures is provided. The method comprises iteratively: holding neural network parameters constant while changing a hardware architecture parameters, calculating a first loss value for a combination of the neural network parameters and hardware architecture parameters according to a gradient-based differentiable function within specified resource constraints, holding the hardware architecture parameters constant while changing the neural network parameters, calculating a second loss value for a new combination of parameters within the specified resource constraints, and combining the first loss value and the second loss value to calculate a combined loss value. The above iterative steps are stopped when the combined loss value reaches a specified threshold, and an optimal combination of neural network parameters and hardware architecture parameters is determined according to the combined loss value.


