Neural Network Potential Generalization Across First-Principles Methods

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing physical property prediction models, such as Neural Network Potentials (NNPs), face challenges in accuracy due to variations in first-principles calculation techniques and parameters, leading to inconsistent results when trained with data from different methods, making it difficult to generalize across different atomic structures and environments.

Innovation Solution

An inferring device and training device are developed to utilize a neural network model trained with data from multiple first-principles calculation techniques, allowing it to infer potential information for various atomic structures and environments by inputting atomic structures and label information, enabling the model to generalize across different conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the NNP is trained using teacher data acquired by a specific parameter for a specific first-principles calculation technique, then the training can be completed, but the accuracy of deduction deteriorates due to a change of conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of deductionVSAvoidrobustness to condition changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The neural network model is trained to handle multiple first-principles calculation techniques and parameter combinations simultaneously. The training data includes diverse combinations of calculation techniques (e.g., different DFT functionals, basis sets) and parameters, enabling the model to generalize across different conditions rather than being specialized for a single technique.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The training process systematically varies calculation parameters and techniques to create a comprehensive training dataset. By exposing the model to multiple parameter combinations during training, it learns to maintain accurate predictions across different conditions, transforming the model from being parameter-specific to parameter-agnostic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If the training of the NNP is executed using teacher data acquired by a combination of a plurality of parameters in a plurality of first-principles calculation techniques, then more data is available, but the accuracy of training cannot be improved because the teacher data is not consistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of training dataVSAvoidaccuracy of training
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of treating inconsistent data as a problem, the invention systematically incorporates parameter variations into the training process. The model is trained to recognize and adapt to different parameter combinations, transforming the inconsistency from a source of error into a source of generalization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The neural network acts as an intermediary that reconciles data from different first-principles calculation techniques. Rather than requiring direct consistency between different calculation methods, the model learns to map diverse input data to accurate predictions, mediating between inconsistent data sources and reliable outputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If first-principles calculation is used to calculate physical properties, then high reliability and interpretability are achieved, but calculation time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of physical property calculationVSAvoidcalculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The neural network model creates a computational copy or surrogate of the first-principles calculation process. Instead of performing actual quantum mechanical calculations for each new atomic structure, the model uses patterns learned from training data to rapidly predict properties, maintaining the reliability of first-principles methods while eliminating their computational cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The computationally intensive first-principles calculations are performed in advance to generate training data. By pre-calculating properties for diverse atomic structures using reliable first-principles methods, the model is trained once with high-quality data and then可以快速 predict properties for new structures without requiring additional first-principles calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240105288A1Inferring device, training device, method, and non-transitory computer readable medium
Publication Date: 2024.03.28 PREFERRED NETWORKS INC
  • US20240105288A1 patent drawing
  • US20240105288A1 patent drawing
  • US20240105288A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An inferring device includes one or more processors. The one or more processors are configured to acquire an output from a neural network model based on information related to an atomic structure and label information related to an atomic simulation, wherein the neural network model is trained to infer a simulation result with respect to the atomic structure generated by the atomic simulation corresponding to the label information.