No-Code Development System Using ML Recommendations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing no-code development systems face challenges in improving the accuracy and efficiency of no-code applications over time, as users may lack understanding of software code and development methodologies, leading to inefficiencies and potential operational issues.

Innovation Solution

A no-code development system that uses a machine-learning based recommendation system to suggest no-code components and configurations to users during application development, improving application accuracy and efficiency over time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If users develop no-code applications without coding knowledge, then ease of operation is improved, but application accuracy and efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of no-code developmentVSAvoidapplication accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the AI assistant analyzes user actions, application state, and best practices to provide real-time recommendations and corrections. This feedback loop enables users to maintain ease of operation while improving application accuracy through guided assistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The AI assistant serves as an intermediary between the user and the no-code development system. It translates user intentions into accurate implementation details, bridging the gap between ease of operation and application precision without requiring users to understand underlying complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If users develop no-code applications without coding knowledge, then ease of operation is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of no-code developmentVSAvoiddevelopment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring components, pre-defining best practices, and preparing optimization recommendations before users complete their development tasks. This enables users to maintain ease of operation while achieving high productivity through advance preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Real-time feedback from the AI assistant provides optimization suggestions and efficiency improvements during the development process, enabling users to maintain ease of operation while significantly improving productivity through continuous guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If the system provides detailed coding guidance, then application accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by providing detailed coding guidance only where necessary and relevant to the current development context. The AI assistant analyzes the specific situation and provides targeted recommendations rather than comprehensive complexity throughout, maintaining accuracy while managing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Manufacturing precision

If the system learns from user actions over time, then application accuracy is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication accuracyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously learns from user actions in the background without interrupting the development workflow. This continuous learning process improves application accuracy over time while minimizing time loss by operating asynchronously with the user's development activities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20250138786A1Adaptive no-code development system
Publication Date: 2025.05.01 EDGE GARETH THOMAS
  • US20250138786A1 patent drawing
  • US20250138786A1 patent drawing
  • US20250138786A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems disclosed herein facilitate generating no-code applications and enable untrained users to develop no-code applications by using machine learning based recommendation systems to recommend no-code components to users. The systems can recommend no-code components during the development of a no-code application and/or after publication of a no-code application. The systems may recommend replacements of selected no-code components. Further, the systems may recommend configurations or alternative configurations of selected no-code components. The recommendations may be determined by using a prediction model trained using one or more machine learning models or algorithms. In some cases, the prediction model may be an ensemble model that uses the results of a plurality of prediction models or machine learning algorithms to make a recommendation. In some cases, usage information obtained for a no-code application can be used to generate recommendations to improve a no-code application with respect to an identified goal for the no-code application.