NO Delivery Control for HFO Ventilators Without Flow Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing NO delivery systems face inaccuracies when used with high-frequency oscillation (HFO) ventilators due to pressure swings causing false flow readings by internal flow sensors, leading to inaccurate NO dosing.

Innovation Solution

A gas delivery system for HFO ventilators that uses a solenoid valve controlled by a control unit, without an internal flow sensor in the NO injection line, utilizing a respiratory gas flow sensor and differential pressure sensor to determine actual flow and deliver NO in pulses based on measured pressure differentials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If an internal flow sensor is used in the NO injection line to measure therapeutic gas flow, then real-time NO dosing control is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to false flow readings caused by HFO pressure swings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time NO dosing controlVSAvoidflow measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the internal flow sensor from the NO injection line, extracting the problematic measurement component that caused false readings during HFO ventilation. Instead, the system uses a proportional valve controlled by a microprocessor that calculates required NO flow based on patient parameters and posology, eliminating the source of measurement error while maintaining automated dosing control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Productivity

If pressure swings are allowed to occur during HFO ventilation to deliver tidal volumes, then ventilation effectiveness is improved, but device complexity increases due to the need for filtering and interpolating flow measurements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveventilation effectivenessVSAvoidflow measurement processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the complex flow measurement processing by removing the internal flow sensor entirely. The system replaces sensor-based measurement with microprocessor-based calculation of NO flow requirements, using patient parameters (age, weight, lung function) and posology to determine the exact NO dose needed, thereby avoiding all filtering and interpolation complexities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical flow sensor system with an electronic control system using a proportional valve and microprocessor. Instead of mechanically measuring flow and then processing the data, the system electronically calculates the required NO flow and directly controls the proportional valve to deliver the precise amount, substituting mechanical measurement with electronic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If a proportional valve is used for NO delivery without internal flow sensor, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision of actual NO flow deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor configurationVSAvoidactual NO flow measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control system where the microprocessor continuously monitors patient parameters and posology requirements, calculates the needed NO flow, adjusts the proportional valve accordingly, and can make real-time adjustments based on patient response. This closed-loop control ensures precise NO delivery without requiring direct flow measurement in the injection line.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Accurately delivers NO doses to patients by compensating for pressure variations, enhancing dosing accuracy without the need for internal flow sensors, even with HFO ventilators.

Implementation Method 1

the respiratory gas flow sensor comprises a flow restriction for creating a pressure differential that is measured by a differential pressure sensor connected to the respiratory gas flow sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP3888727B1Gas delivery system for providing gaseous no to a patient
Publication Date: 2025.12.17 LAIR LIQUIDE SA POUR LETUDE & LEXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE
  • EP3888727B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3888727B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention concerns a gas delivery system (1, 2) for providing gaseous NO to a patient comprising a medical ventilator (2) providing a respiratory gas, such as air, to a patient breathing circuit (3) having an inspiratory limb (31) with a flow sensor (100) and an NO injection module (110), and a NO-delivery device (1) for providing a NO-containing gas to the NO injection module (110) of the inspiratory limb (31), said NO delivery device (1) including a control unit (130) and a differential pressure sensor (104). The medical ventilator (2) can be a HFO ventilator.