No-Back Ball Screw Actuator for Bidirectional Backdrive Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electromechanical actuators face challenges in resisting large back driving forces, especially when driving heavy loads at high speeds, and may fail to maintain position if the motor fails.

Innovation Solution

A compact and efficient electromechanical actuator design that incorporates a ball screw system with a no-back device, utilizing a sprag clutch and skewed roller assemblies to resist both tension and compression back driving forces without relying on electrical power, ensuring the actuator holds its position even if the motor fails.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the pitch of a ball screw actuator is adjusted to drive loads at faster rates of speed, then the speed increases, but back driving forces become larger and more difficult to resist

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverate of speedVSAvoidback driving forces
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The no-back device is segmented into two independent one-way clutch assemblies: a first one-way clutch assembly for resisting compression back driving forces and a second one-way clutch assembly for resisting tension back driving forces. Each assembly operates independently to handle specific directional forces, allowing the actuator to maintain high speed capability while effectively resisting back driving forces in both directions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

One-way clutch assemblies serve as intermediary mechanical elements between the ball screw mechanism and the load. These clutches mediate the force transmission by allowing motion in the driving direction while blocking reverse motion, thereby resisting back driving forces without interfering with the forward motion capability needed for high speed operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a no-back device is added to resist back driving forces, then the reliability improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to resist back driving forcesVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The no-back device uses universal one-way clutch assemblies that can resist both compression and tension back driving forces through two independently configured assemblies. This multi-functional approach allows a single no-back device structure to handle multiple force conditions (compression, tension, static, dynamic) without requiring entirely separate mechanisms for each condition, thereby improving reliability while limiting complexity growth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The one-way clutch assemblies provide self-service by automatically engaging to resist back driving forces without requiring external control signals or additional actuation mechanisms. The clutches self-activate based on the direction of force applied, providing reliable back driving resistance through their inherent mechanical design rather than requiring complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If a ball screw system with no-back device is used, then the ability to resist back driving forces improves, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveback driving force resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process is segmented into modular assembly steps: first the ball screw mechanism is manufactured and tested, then the first and second one-way clutch assemblies are separately manufactured and configured, and finally they are assembled together with the housing and drive shaft. This segmentation allows each component to be manufactured using standard processes and then integrated, reducing overall manufacturing complexity compared to creating a fully integrated custom mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The one-way clutch assemblies serve as intermediary components that can be manufactured using established clutch manufacturing processes and then integrated into the ball screw system. This approach avoids the need to develop entirely new manufacturing processes for the no-back functionality, as the clutch assemblies are mature, well-understood mechanical components that can be produced through conventional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The actuator effectively resists back driving forces in both static and dynamic states, maintaining position and preventing movement if the motor fails, thus ensuring reliable operation across various applications such as aircraft flap control.

Implementation Method 1

The sprag clutch is oriented to resist relative rotation of the first static disk and the housing in a first direction and allows free relative rotation of the first static disk and the housing in a second direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

a first compression skewed roller assembly positioned between the radially extending ball screw flange and the first static disk first compression skewed roller engagement surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Data Source

PatentUS11623739B2Electromechanical actuator with no-back system
Publication Date: 2023.04.11 EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LTD
  • US11623739B2 patent drawing
  • US11623739B2 patent drawing
  • US11623739B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A compact, efficient, and reliable electromechanical actuator that is capable of driving heavy loads at a high rate of speed and also capable of resisting large back driving forces. The actuator resists tension and compression back driving forces in a static state as well as when the actuator extends and retracts. The back driving forces are resisted even if the electronics (e.g., motor) fail.