Node Device Autonomous Route Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network routing systems, particularly in wireless communication, face challenges in maintaining high communication quality due to the dynamic nature of link changes and the need for each node to autonomously select an optimal route without overloading the network, especially as the number of nodes increases.

Innovation Solution

A node device equipped with an identification information management table, a destination node weighting table, and a frame destination determination device that autonomously selects the best route by updating weights based on the possibility of successful frame transfer, allowing each node to determine the optimal path without requiring a centralized server or extensive network topology knowledge.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If each node autonomously selects routes using traditional routing protocols (AODV, OLSR), then route selection capability is improved, but network load increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous route selectionVSAvoidnetwork load
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the routing decision parameter from complex topology-aware metrics to simple weight values associated with each node. Nodes are assigned weights that reflect their routing quality, and route selection is based on minimizing the sum of weights along the path. This parameter simplification reduces computational complexity and message overhead while maintaining autonomous route selection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a self-service mechanism where nodes automatically update their own weight values based on local observations of frame transmission success. Each node monitors whether frames sent to it are successfully received and adjusts its weight accordingly, without requiring centralized control or extensive coordination with other nodes. This self-service approach reduces network load while maintaining adaptive route selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If nodes update routing information frequently to adapt to link changes, then route quality is improved, but communication overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute qualityVSAvoidcommunication overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic weight updates triggered by successful frame transmissions rather than continuous or frequent updates. When a node successfully receives a frame, it updates its weight value at that moment. This event-driven periodic update mechanism ensures route quality adapts to link changes while minimizing unnecessary communication overhead compared to continuous updating schemes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feedback from frame transmission outcomes to adjust routing weights. When frames are successfully transmitted to a node, the node's weight is updated to reflect improved routing quality. This feedback mechanism ensures that routing information adapts to actual link conditions without requiring excessive communication, as updates are triggered only by meaningful events (successful transmissions).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If centralized server manages routing in large-scale networks, then route optimization is improved, but system complexity and management overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute optimizationVSAvoidcentralized management structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates centralized routing management by enabling each node to autonomously determine its weight value based on local frame transmission success. Nodes independently adjust their own routing parameters without requiring a central server to compute or distribute routing information. This self-service approach maintains route optimization capability while dramatically reducing system complexity and management overhead in large-scale networks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the routing decision-making process from centralized control to distributed autonomous operation. Each node independently manages its own weight value and participates in route selection based on local information. This segmentation of routing functionality into independent node-level decisions eliminates the need for centralized management infrastructure while maintaining effective route optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2273732B1Node device and program
Publication Date: 2018.03.21 FUJITSU LTD
  • EP2273732B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2273732B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2273732B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A node device and a program of simple structures autonomously select an appropriate route without imposing a load on a network. In a node device 1 in a communication network, an FID management table 5 stores an FID for unique identification of a frame and the information about a destination node of the frame, and a weighting table 7 stores weighting information about another node as a destination for relay of the frame for each final destination node of the frame. When a frame transmitted to a local node is received, and if the FID of the received frame is stored in the FID management table 5, the data about the destination node associated with the FID is updated. If the FID of the frame received from the frame reception device is not stored in the FID management table 5, the FID management table 5 corresponding to the destination node of the frame is referred to, and another node as a destination for relay of the frame is determined.