Node Orientation Detection via Accelerometer Vector Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In aircraft systems with bussed network topologies, determining the physical location of components is labor-intensive and prone to errors, especially during installation or replacement, as opposed to point-to-point systems which require significant wiring and are heavier.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing multi-axis accelerometers to evaluate the physical location of nodes within a network by comparing their acceleration vectors to a reference vector, with a controller using a lookup table to determine the logical function and location of each node, allowing for automated identification and mapping of components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If bussed network architecture is used instead of point-to-point wiring, then aircraft weight is reduced, but determining physical location of components becomes labor-intensive and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaircraft weightVSAvoidcomponent location identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables components to automatically identify and report their own physical locations through accelerometer-based orientation detection and wireless communication, eliminating the need for manual location recording during installation and maintenance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical identification processes with automated electronic systems using accelerometers, microcontrollers, and wireless communication to determine and transmit component location data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If manual identification of component locations is performed during installation or replacement, then physical location data can be recorded, but labor costs increase and errors may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation data accuracyVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Components automatically determine and communicate their own location data through integrated accelerometers and microcontrollers, eliminating manual identification processes and reducing both installation time and error rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs automatic location identification during the component installation process itself, rather than requiring separate manual recording steps, thereby integrating location data capture into the normal installation workflow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces labor costs and minimizes errors by enabling automated self-identification of components in bussed networks, maintaining accurate logical-to-physical mapping without the need for extensive wiring, thus balancing weight reduction with efficient installation processes.

Implementation Method 1

When there is no acceleration of the object, the accelerometer may measure its acceleration vector relative to the force of gravity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP2940431B1Automatic determination of the orientation of a device
Publication Date: 2017.10.18 SIMMONDS PRECISION PRODUCTS INC
  • EP2940431B1 patent drawing
  • EP2940431B1 patent drawing
  • EP2940431B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for evaluating a physical location of a node in a network comprising a multi-axis accelerometer 102 installed in proximity to the node and in a deterministic spacial orientation, and/or a controller (202) configured to receive an acceleration vector associated with the multi-axis accelerometer and to evaluate the orientation of the node based on the received acceleration vector in comparison to a reference acceleration vector known to the controller and a look-up table in memory (206) configured to contain the logical function and a node location identifier for each spatial orientation. The node may comprise a system component.