Node Placement Service for RF Network Planning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The placement of Radio Access Network (RAN) devices in large-scale networks is often inconsistent and sub-optimal due to varying weights given to different types of information by network management personnel, leading to inefficient resource deployment and potential interference issues.

Innovation Solution

A node placement service that uses network information to identify traffic profiles and calculate time values based on traffic volume and performance metrics, prioritizing geographic areas for RAN device placement to optimize RF network planning and minimize human influence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If network management personnel manually determine RAN device placement based on varying weights of different information types, then human expertise and flexibility are utilized, but inconsistency and sub-optimality occur in placement decisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman expertise in placement decisionsVSAvoidconsistency of placement decisions
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated RAN device placement decisions by having the network management system itself perform the evaluation and selection process without human intervention. The system automatically determines traffic profiles, calculates time values, and identifies candidate geographic areas based on predefined criteria, eliminating the inconsistency of manual human decisions while preserving adaptability through configurable parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms subjective human judgment into objective parameter-based decisions by calculating quantitative metrics such as time values based on traffic volume and performance metrics. By changing the decision-making parameters from subjective weights to objective calculated values, the system achieves both consistency and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If automated algorithms are used to determine RAN device placement, then consistency and objectivity improve, but the ability to incorporate nuanced human judgment may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of placement decisionsVSAvoidhuman expertise in placement decisions
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary layer of automated analysis that processes network information and traffic patterns to generate objective placement recommendations. This intermediary algorithmic layer maintains consistency while preserving adaptability by incorporating multiple information types and allowing configuration of evaluation criteria to reflect different network management priorities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If multiple types of network information are considered with varying weights, then comprehensive evaluation is achieved, but decision-making complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoiddecision-making process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex decision-making process into distinct, manageable components: traffic profile identification, time value calculation, and candidate area selection. Each component processes specific types of information independently, reducing overall complexity while maintaining comprehensive evaluation through the structured combination of these segmented processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system simplifies complex multi-criteria evaluation by transforming it into a standardized parameter framework where different information types are converted into comparable metrics such as time values. This parameter standardization reduces decision-making complexity while preserving evaluation accuracy through mathematically rigorous transformations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If RAN devices are placed densely to accommodate increasing users, then network capacity improves, but interference between devices increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork capacityVSAvoidinterference between devices
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality optimization by evaluating placement decisions at specific geographic locations rather than uniformly across the entire network. By analyzing traffic profiles and performance metrics for each candidate area independently, the system can place devices densely in high-traffic areas while maintaining appropriate spacing in lower-traffic areas, thus increasing overall capacity while minimizing interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11736960B2Node placement service
Publication Date: 2023.08.22 VERIZON PATENT & LICENSING INC
  • US11736960B2 patent drawing
  • US11736960B2 patent drawing
  • US11736960B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, a device, and a non-transitory storage medium provide a node placement service. The node placement service may generate geo-bins pertaining to a radio access network device, a sector of the radio access network device, or a sub-sector. The node placement service may generate time values for the geo-bins based on network information associated with end devices and the geo-bins. The node placement service may also generate return on investment values for the geo-bins based on the network information. The node placement service may use the time values, the return on investment values, or both for radio frequency design of a geo-bin.