Two-Stage Noise Classification for User Content Audio

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing audio processing systems struggle to differentiate between user-generated content (UGC) noise and professionally-generated content (PGC) noise, leading to inadequate noise reduction or enhancement, which affects the quality of UGC with low audio quality due to environmental and recording device limitations.

Innovation Solution

A two-stage noise classification system using machine learning models to detect and distinguish UGC noise from PGC noise, applying specific audio processing techniques to improve audio quality by processing audio signals based on confidence scores calculated from feature extraction and classification processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If audio processing techniques are applied to enhance audio quality in UGC, then audio quality is improved, but noise reduction effectiveness deteriorates because the system cannot distinguish UGC noise from PGC noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio qualityVSAvoidnoise detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides noise detection into two distinct stages: first detecting whether noise is present, then classifying the type of noise (UGC or PGC). This segmentation allows the system to apply different processing strategies for different noise types, resolving the contradiction between enhancing audio quality and accurately detecting noise characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary classification mechanism that sits between noise detection and audio processing. This intermediary stage analyzes additional features (spectral characteristics, temporal patterns, source identification) to determine whether the detected noise is UGC or PGC, enabling the system to make informed decisions about whether to apply noise reduction, thereby improving both audio quality and detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If noise reduction methods are applied to all detected noise, then UGC noise is reduced, but PGC noise is incorrectly removed which degrades content quality

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUGC noise impactVSAvoidcontent integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different processing qualities to different types of noise based on their characteristics. For UGC noise, aggressive noise reduction is applied to eliminate harmful background sounds. For PGC noise, a more conservative approach is used to preserve the artistic intent and content integrity. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between reducing harmful noise and maintaining content reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the noise reduction strength based on the classified noise type. When UGC noise is detected, stronger reduction parameters are applied. When PGC noise is detected, weaker or no reduction is applied. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to effectively reduce harmful noise while preserving content integrity, resolving the contradiction between these two opposing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Stability of the object's composition

If volume leveling techniques are applied to UGC, then audio consistency is improved, but UGC noise is boosted which negatively impacts user experience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio consistencyVSAvoidnoise prominence
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary noise classification and reduction before applying volume leveling techniques. By removing or reducing UGC noise in advance, the subsequent volume leveling operation does not amplify harmful noise while still achieving audio consistency. This preliminary action resolves the contradiction between improving audio stability and preventing noise amplification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240355348A1Detecting environmental noise in user-generated content
Publication Date: 2024.10.24 DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORP
  • US20240355348A1 patent drawing
  • US20240355348A1 patent drawing
  • US20240355348A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of audio processing includes classifying an audio signal as noise or as non-noise using a first model. For a noise signal. the audio signal is classified as user-generated content (UGC) noise or as professionally-generated content (PGC) noise using a second model. For a non-noise signal or PGC noise. the audio signal is processed using a first audio processing process. For UGC noise. the audio signal is processed using a second audio processing process.