Noise-Corrected Patient Fall Risk State Prediction System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current patient fall prediction systems generate a high number of false alarms due to noise interference and are unable to accurately distinguish between non-risky and risky patient movements, leading to decreased vigilance among healthcare professionals and reduced effectiveness in preventing falls.

Innovation Solution

A noise correcting patient fall risk state prediction system that evaluates video frames to define discrete fall risk states by subdividing the patient's image into body parts and using fall risk state transition rules, excluding noise from processing and postponing alerts until confirmed movement is detected, thereby reducing false alarms and improving the accuracy of fall risk assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If video monitoring is used to detect patient movements, then fall detection capability is improved, but false alarm rate increases due to noise interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall detection accuracyVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patient's body is segmented into multiple body parts (head, torso, limbs) and the video frame is divided into predetermined areas. Motion detection is performed separately for each body part rather than treating the entire patient as a single object, enabling more precise identification of meaningful movements versus noise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different fall risk state transition rules are applied to different body parts based on their local characteristics. For example, movement of the head or upper body may indicate different fall risks compared to lower body movement, allowing customized detection thresholds and rules for each body part

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If motion detection sensitivity is increased to capture all patient movements, then detection capability is improved, but false alarm rate increases due to non-dangerous motions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement detection sensitivityVSAvoidfalse alarms from non-risky movements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of detected movements by evaluating them against fall risk state transition rules before generating alerts. Movements are assessed in context of the patient's current fall risk state, and only movements that represent actual transitions to higher risk states trigger alerts, filtering out non-dangerous motions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously updates the patient's fall risk state based on detected movements and uses this state information to modulate future detection sensitivity. The current fall risk state serves as feedback that adjusts how subsequent movements are interpreted, allowing the system to be more sensitive when risk is low and more selective when risk is already high

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If continuous monitoring is implemented to improve patient safety, then patient safety is improved, but healthcare costs increase due to additional staffing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient safetyVSAvoidmonitoring staff requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The video monitoring system operates autonomously to perform continuous patient surveillance, automatically detecting movements, evaluating fall risk states, and generating alerts without requiring constant human observation. The system serves itself by processing video data and making detection decisions, replacing the need for dedicated monitoring staff

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of human staff monitoring with an automated video processing system using image analysis algorithms. The electronic automated detection system substitutes for human visual monitoring, providing continuous surveillance without the associated labor costs and limitations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9318012B2Noise correcting patient fall risk state system and method for predicting patient falls
Publication Date: 2016.04.19 CAREVIEW COMMUNICATIONS INC
  • US9318012B2 patent drawing
  • US9318012B2 patent drawing
  • US9318012B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A patient fall prediction system from noise corrected surveillance video by identifying patient fall risk states. A hierarchy of discrete patient fall risk states, from no risk, to intermediate risk to critical risk, describe a patient fall risk. The system transitions from state to state based on changes detected in corresponding areas between a current video frame and a background frame. A set of fall risk state transition rules govern the entry into new fall risk states. A video frame is subdivided into multiple predetermined areas, at least two contain images of the patient. The number of false alarms are reduced by accurately defining fall risk state transition rules and by reducing the opportunity for noise to impact the state transition results. Frames that contain new changes are excluded from fall risk state processing, i.e., the first video frame that might cause an erroneous elevated fall risk state is culled.