Active Noise Reduction Feedback Instability Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Active noise reduction systems, particularly those using feedback loops, can become unstable due to changes in the plant transfer function, leading to undesirable artifacts like tones or squealing, which existing technologies fail to reliably detect and mitigate.

Innovation Solution

The system detects instability by monitoring the similarity between the plant transfer function and the reciprocal of the feedback transfer function, using comparators and signal processing techniques to identify when the loop gain becomes unity, allowing for corrective actions to prevent feedback instability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If feedback noise reduction is implemented, then noise reduction performance is improved, but system stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reduction performanceVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of feedback instability conditions by monitoring the plant transfer function and comparing it to the reciprocal of the feedback filter transfer function before full feedback control is applied. This early detection allows the system to take preventive actions, such as reducing feedback gain or switching to feedforward-only mode, thereby maintaining stability while preserving noise reduction performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the output of the feedback microphone is continuously monitored and fed back to the controller. The controller uses this feedback information to detect when instability conditions are approaching and adjusts the feedback gain accordingly, creating a closed-loop system that automatically maintains stability while maximizing noise reduction effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Stability of the object's composition

If conservative design practices are used to prevent instability, then system stability is improved, but noise reduction bandwidth is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidnoise reduction bandwidth
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static, conservative design parameters to dynamic, adaptive parameters. The feedback gain is not fixed but is continuously adjusted based on real-time detection of plant transfer function characteristics. When the system detects that stability margins are sufficient, it increases the feedback gain to maximize noise reduction bandwidth. When instability conditions are detected, it reduces the gain to maintain stability, thereby achieving both wide bandwidth and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the feedback gain parameter based on the detected characteristics of the plant transfer function. By monitoring how the plant transfer function varies with frequency and environmental conditions, the system adjusts the feedback gain parameter in real-time to optimize both stability and noise reduction performance across the widest possible bandwidth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If feedback loop gain is increased to improve noise reduction, then noise reduction effectiveness is improved, but risk of instability increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reduction effectivenessVSAvoidinstability risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces traditional mechanical or fixed gain feedback mechanisms with a digital signal processing-based detection and control system. By using digital processors to analyze the plant transfer function and compute stability margins, the system can precisely control the feedback gain to operate at the optimal point between effectiveness and instability risk, rather than using conservative fixed gains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary detection mechanism that sits between the feedback loop and the noise reduction controller. This intermediary monitors the plant transfer function characteristics and provides stability information to the controller, allowing the controller to adjust feedback gain in real-time to maximize noise reduction effectiveness while staying clear of instability conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3803851B1Real-time detection of feedback instability
Publication Date: 2024.11.27 BOSE CORP
  • EP3803851B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3803851B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3803851B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Audio systems and methods are provided that detect instability in active feedback noise reduction circuitry. An acoustic transducer converts a driver signal into an acoustic signal, and a microphone provides a feedback signal. The feedback signal is processed, through a first transfer function, to provide an anti-noise signal. The driver signal is based at least in part upon the anti-noise signal, to reduce acoustic noise in the environment of the acoustic transducer. The driver signal is also filtered by a filter having a second transfer function that is inverse of the first transfer function, to provide a reference signal. The feedback signal is compared to the reference signal to determine a feedback instability, based upon the comparison.