Noise Reduction Weighting for Headset Consistency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing noise reduction methods for headsets struggle to maintain consistent performance during both speech and speech-absent periods, with SNR-based methods providing insufficient noise reduction during gaps.

Innovation Solution

The method involves receiving audio signals from internal and external microphones, processing them to obtain full-band power estimates, and adjusting weights based on these estimates to blend the signals, prioritizing the signal with lower full-band power during speech gaps to maintain 20-30 dB noise reduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If SNR-based methods are used for noise reduction, then noise reduction is effective during speech periods, but noise reduction performance becomes insufficient during speech gaps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reduction performance consistencyVSAvoidnoise reduction effectiveness during speech gaps
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between full-band power estimation and SNR-based weighting based on speech detection. During speech gaps, full-band power estimation is used to maintain noise reduction consistency, while during speech periods, SNR-based weighting optimizes noise reduction effectiveness. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between consistent noise reduction and effective noise reduction during different periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the weighting parameter selection based on speech presence detection. When speech is absent, full-band power estimates are used to determine weights, ensuring consistent noise reduction. When speech is present, SNR-based weights are applied for optimized noise reduction. This parameter change strategy allows the system to maintain both consistency and effectiveness across different operational states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If internal microphone is used for acoustic isolation, then noise reduction is achieved, but voice quality becomes muffled and bandwidth is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexternal noise interferenceVSAvoidvoice quality and bandwidth
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges signals from both internal and external microphones through adaptive weighting. The internal microphone provides noise isolation while the external microphone provides natural voice quality. By combining both signals with appropriate weights based on full-band power estimates, the system achieves both noise reduction and voice quality preservation simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different quality characteristics to different frequency bands and time periods. During speech gaps, full-band power estimation emphasizes noise reduction. During speech periods, the system balances noise reduction with voice quality preservation. This local quality adjustment allows the system to optimize for different requirements in different contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If full-band power estimation is used for weight adjustment, then noise reduction consistency is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reduction consistencyVSAvoidsignal processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs full-band power estimation periodically rather than continuously. It detects speech gaps using periodic power analysis and only applies full-band power-based weighting during these gaps. During normal speech periods, the system uses lighter SNR-based weighting. This periodic application reduces computational complexity while maintaining noise reduction consistency when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS9812149B2Methods and systems for providing consistency in noise reduction during speech and non-speech periods
Publication Date: 2017.11.07 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US9812149B2 patent drawing
  • US9812149B2 patent drawing
  • US9812149B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for providing consistency in noise reduction during speech and non-speech periods are provided. First and second signals are received. The first signal includes at least a voice component. The second signal includes at least the voice component modified by human tissue of a user. First and second weights may be assigned per subband to the first and second signals, respectively. The first and second signals are processed to obtain respective first and second full-band power estimates. During periods when the user's speech is not present, the first weight and the second weight are adjusted based at least partially on the first full-band power estimate and the second full-band power estimate. The first and second signals are blended based on the adjusted weights to generate an enhanced voice signal. The second signal may be aligned with the first signal prior to the blending.