NOMA Power Perturbation for Interference Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communications, especially in non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) systems, path loss and non-line-of-sight losses limit coverage area, and existing methods struggle to efficiently manage transmission power across multiple layers to enhance diversity and separate signals effectively.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of perturbation patterns across transmission layers, including power perturbation, delay insertion, and random precoding, to differentiate power levels and improve decoding performance, with configurations based on transmission characteristics, antenna ports, and priority levels, allowing for single or multiple antenna port transmissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple transmission layers are used in NOMA systems, then system capacity and coverage area are improved, but signal separation difficulty and interference increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capacityVSAvoidsignal separation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies power perturbation patterns that dynamically change the power allocation parameters across different transmission layers. By introducing controlled variations in power levels according to predefined patterns, the system maintains high capacity while creating distinguishable power differences that facilitate signal separation at the receiver side.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent pre-configures perturbation patterns and power allocation schemes before transmission. The receiver is provided with information about the perturbation patterns applied to different layers, enabling it to perform effective signal separation and interference cancellation by anticipating the power distribution structure before actual signal processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Area of stationary object

If transmission power is increased to overcome path loss, then coverage area is improved, but interference between layers and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidinterference between layers
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different perturbation patterns to different transmission layers, creating local quality differences in power distribution. Each layer experiences a unique power perturbation pattern, which allows the system to maintain high transmission power for coverage while ensuring that each layer remains distinguishable through its specific power characteristics, thereby reducing inter-layer interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If perturbation patterns are applied to differentiate power levels, then signal diversity and decoding performance are improved, but system complexity and computational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding performanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic perturbation patterns that repeat across transmission blocks. This periodic structure allows the receiver to efficiently track and decode signals by leveraging the predictable, repeating nature of the perturbations, reducing computational complexity compared to completely random or aperiodic power variations while maintaining signal diversity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Area of stationary object

If beamforming is used to compensate for path loss, then coverage area is improved, but hardware complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidhardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces hardware-based beamforming mechanisms with software-based power perturbation techniques. Instead of relying on complex antenna array configurations and signal processing hardware to achieve coverage extension, the system uses computational power allocation strategies that achieve similar coverage improvement while reducing hardware complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11937189B2Robust NOMA transmission
Publication Date: 2024.03.19 INTERDIGITAL PATENT HOLDINGS INC
  • US11937189B2 patent drawing
  • US11937189B2 patent drawing
  • US11937189B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and instrumentalities are provided that are associated with multi-layer transmissions such as multi-layer NOMA transmissions. A per-layer perturbation pattern may be applied to the multiple layers to create differences among the transmission power levels of the layers. MAS and NOMA resource indications may be provided, e.g., through TCI state. Dynamic MAS and NOMA resource indications may be provided. Uplink CSI-RS techniques may be provided, e.g., for interference measurement.