Non-Certified Flight Computer for Rapid Aircraft Communication Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The certification process for aircraft components, such as communications management units and radios, is time-consuming and costly, hindering rapid customization or correction of functionality flaws that could impact safety.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a non-certified computer in vehicles to perform functions that do not require government certification, such as encryption, decryption, compression, and encoding, allowing for rapid modification and correction of flaws without the need for additional approval.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If certification is performed for all communication components including CMU and radios, then safety and reliability are ensured, but time consumption and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the communication system into two parts: a certified CMU that handles critical aircraft communication functions and requires certification, and a non-certified external computer that handles optional customization and non-critical functions. This segmentation allows the certified portion to maintain safety while the non-certified portion can be modified rapidly without going through lengthy certification processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts non-essential communication functions from the certified CMU and relocates them to a non-certified external computer. This extraction enables rapid modification of customization functions without affecting the certified status of the core communication system, thereby reducing time consumption and cost while maintaining safety for critical functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If certification is performed for all communication components including CMU and radios, then safety and reliability are ensured, but cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the communication system into a certified CMU handling critical functions and a non-certified external computer handling optional functions. This segmentation reduces certification cost by limiting the certified portion to only what is essential for aircraft safety, while customization functions can be developed and deployed without certification overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts non-critical customization functions from the certified system and places them in a non-certified external computer. This extraction eliminates the need to pay certification costs for functions that do not impact aircraft safety, thereby reducing overall system cost while maintaining safety for essential communication functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Adaptability or versatility

If functionality is customized in certified components, then customer demands are met, but certification time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecustomizationVSAvoidcertification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts customization functions from the certified CMU and implements them in a non-certified external computer. This allows customer-specific customizations to be developed, modified, and deployed rapidly without undergoing certification processes, as these customization functions do not impact the safety-critical certified system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary external computer that acts as a bridge between the certified CMU and customization requirements. This intermediary handles all customizable functions, allowing rapid adaptation to customer demands while the certified CMU remains unchanged and maintains its certification status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If functionality is customized in certified components, then customer demands are met, but certification cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecustomizationVSAvoidcertification cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts all customization-related functions from the certified CMU and relocates them to a non-certified external computer. This extraction eliminates certification costs associated with customization, as the external computer and its customized software do not require government certification, thereby meeting customer demands cost-effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary external computer that handles all customization requirements. This intermediary isolates customization functions from the certified system, allowing customers to obtain customized functionality without incurring additional certification costs, as the intermediary itself does not require certification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12470404B2Systems and methods for performing certain communication functions in a non-certified computer
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US12470404B2 patent drawing
  • US12470404B2 patent drawing
  • US12470404B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are provided for facilitating less expensive and more rapid implement and modification of processes, e.g., communications processes, performed in a vehicle, e.g., a commercial aircraft, by implementing those functions on a non-certified computer. This is because the non-certified computer and the functions which it performs do not require certification by a government entity. Optionally, the non-certified computer is communicatively coupled to a communications management unit which requires certification from the government entity. Optionally, the non-certified computer may be an electronic flight bag for commercial aviation applications.