Non-Compacting Biomass Reactor for Saccharification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing biomass treatment methods face challenges in efficiently moving high dry weight biomass through reactors while maintaining accessibility by chemical reactants, leading to suboptimal saccharification and increased costs due to compacting and energy-intensive de-compaction processes.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a non-compacting feeder and reactor system that uses a cylindrical barrel with a piston and flash tank, where biomass is treated with dilute aqueous ammonia and steam at moderate temperatures, allowing for maximal accessibility and penetration of reactants without compacting, thus optimizing saccharification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If biomass is compacted into a solid plug state for reactor movement, then material transport is improved, but accessibility by chemical reactants deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial transportVSAvoidreactant accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of compacting biomass into a dense plug and then attempting to de-compact it for treatment, the invention inverts the approach by maintaining biomass in a loose, non-compacted state throughout the treatment process. The piston-driven system moves biomass through the reactor without compression, allowing chemical reactants to penetrate effectively while still achieving material transport.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts the compaction step from the process entirely. By removing the compaction mechanism that creates dense biomass plugs, the system eliminates the subsequent need for de-compaction, allowing reactants to access biomass directly in its natural loose state while maintaining continuous material movement through the reactor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If biomass is compacted to prevent blow-back, then system reliability is improved, but energy input for de-compaction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblow-back preventionVSAvoidde-compaction energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention inverts the conventional approach by preventing blow-back through system design rather than through compaction. The piston-driven displacement system and controlled discharge mechanism maintain reliability and prevent blow-back while keeping biomass in a loose, non-compacted state that requires no de-compaction energy input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Productivity

If high dry weight biomass concentration is used, then productivity is improved, but reactant penetration capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefermentable sugar concentrationVSAvoidreactant penetration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the compaction step that would otherwise be necessary to achieve high dry weight concentrations. By maintaining biomass in a loose state and using piston-driven displacement, the system achieves high productivity with concentrated biomass while preserving reactant penetration capability through the absence of compression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional compacting equipment is used, then capital cost is reduced, but energy input for stirring and rotation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment costVSAvoidstirring and rotation energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces conventional mechanical stirring and rotation systems with a piston-driven displacement system. This substitution eliminates the need for continuous stirring and rotation mechanisms, reducing both equipment complexity and ongoing energy input while maintaining effective biomass movement and treatment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables high conversion of biomass carbohydrates to fermentable sugars with reduced energy input and lower capital costs, achieving effective saccharification and fermentation of biomass without the need for de-compaction steps.

Implementation Method 1

a piston and flash tank wherein the piston moves the biomass and aqueous ammonia mixture through the cylindrical barrel into the flash tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

the biomass is not compacted and treated biomass is produced

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure reduction: Depressurisation

Data Source

PatentEP2190883B1Biomass treatment method
Publication Date: 2014.11.19 EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO
  • EP2190883B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2190883B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2190883B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for treating biomass was developed that uses an apparatus which moves a biomass and dilute aqueous ammonia mixture through reaction chambers without compaction. The apparatus moves the biomass using a non-compressing piston (34). The resulting treated biomass is saccharified to produce fermentable sugars.