Non-contact Optical Switch for Elevator and Door Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing switches for elevators and automatic doors require separate installation and wiring for disabled and non-disabled users, leading to increased costs and risks of infection and improper operation due to contact-based mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A non-contact switch system using a pair of long sensor blocks with sensors installed in line, allowing finger movement direction, length, and speed to be sensed, eliminating the need for direct contact and enabling integrated installation for both user types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If contact type switches (push-button or touch pad) are used, then the switch can be operated easily by non-disabled persons, but there is a high risk of bacterial or viral infection through finger contact and improper operation by disabled persons

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidinfection risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical contact-based switching system with an optical sensing system. The optical sensor detects finger movement through a gap without requiring physical contact, thereby eliminating infection risk while maintaining ease of operation. The sensor detects changes in light transmission caused by finger movement to activate the switch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an optical field as an intermediary between the user's finger and the switch mechanism. Instead of direct mechanical contact, the finger modulates light transmission through the gap, and the optical sensor converts this optical modulation into a switching signal, serving as a non-contact intermediary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If separate switches are installed for disabled and non-disabled persons, then the risk of improper operation by disabled persons is reduced, but installation cost and wiring complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation accuracyVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal switch that serves both disabled and non-disabled persons through the same mechanism. The optical sensor detects finger movement patterns that work for all users regardless of physical ability, eliminating the need for separate switches and reducing installation complexity while maintaining operation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses dynamic detection of finger movement characteristics (direction, length, speed) to differentiate between intentional activation and accidental contact. This dynamic approach allows a single switch to reliably serve all users by adapting to different usage patterns without requiring separate static switch configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If the gap between sensor blocks is reduced to detect finger movement, then the sensitivity of detection is improved, but the risk of accidental activation by disabled persons fumbling increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidfalse activation risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent requires a specific pattern of finger movement (excessive action in terms of movement distance and direction) to activate the switch. Rather than detecting any finger presence, the system requires the finger to move through the gap in a specific manner, which reduces false activation from accidental contact while maintaining detection sensitivity for intentional use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by analyzing multiple parameters of finger movement (direction, length, speed) to determine whether activation is intentional or accidental. The system processes the movement pattern information and provides feedback control, only activating the switch when the movement pattern matches the expected intentional usage pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The non-contact switch reduces installation costs, ensures sanitation, and minimizes malfunctions caused by accidental contact, providing a safe and accessible operation for both non-disabled and disabled users.

Implementation Method 1

a beam switch using an optical sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical sensing: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS8872387B2Non-contact selection switch
Publication Date: 2014.10.28 YOON IL SHIK
  • US8872387B2 patent drawing
  • US8872387B2 patent drawing
  • US8872387B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a non-contact switch which is used for an elevator or general automatic doors, and comprises: buttons B including a push button or an optical sensor button for selecting an elevator movement or opening an automatic door; a pair of long sensor blocks 10, which are installed adjacent to or above the push button and arranged so as to face each other with a gap 12 equivalent to the width of one to two human fingers therebetween; and a plurality of sensors S which are installed in a single file on the surfaces of the sensor blocks that face each other, wherein a sensor detects movement of a human finger moving with the gap 12 at or above a predetermined length or at or above a predetermined speed and selects an upward or downward movement for a destination floor for the elevator or opens the automatic door.