Methods and apparatus for non-destructive adhesive devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing non-destructive adhesive devices (NDADs) face challenges such as catapulting of attached objects during removal, which poses a risk of injury and requires complex procedures for attachment and detachment.

Innovation Solution

The development of a new type of NDAD with a hybrid carrier and inelastic regions that allows for a more controlled debonding process, featuring a nonlinear structure and peelable tabs for enhanced safety and simplicity, utilizing a hybrid carrier that stretches up to five times its bonded length without tearing, and providing visual feedback during debonding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional adhesive devices are used for attachment, then strong adhesive bond is achieved, but catapulting of attached objects occurs during removal causing injury risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesive bond strengthVSAvoidcatapulting injury risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The adhesive device is segmented into multiple functional regions: a first adhesive region for initial bonding, a second adhesive region for controlled debonding, and a tab region for user manipulation. This segmentation allows the adhesive to maintain strong bond strength while enabling controlled removal that prevents catapulting by distributing the debonding force across different regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the adhesive device are assigned different local properties: the first adhesive region has high adhesion strength for bonding, the second adhesive region has controlled debonding characteristics, and the tab region has low adhesion for easy release. This local differentiation allows the device to simultaneously achieve strong attachment and safe removal without catapulting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If complex procedures are implemented to prevent catapulting, then safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatapulting preventionVSAvoidattachment and detachment procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The adhesive device is designed to automatically control its own debonding process through the sequential activation of different adhesive regions. When the user pulls the tab, the device inherently progresses through controlled debonding stages without requiring user knowledge of complex procedures, making the safety feature self-executing and the operation simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The adhesive device is pre-configured with multiple adhesive regions having different debonding characteristics before use. The first adhesive region is designed to fail first, followed by the second adhesive region, creating a built-in sequential debonding mechanism that prevents catapulting without requiring the user to perform complex actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Area of stationary object

If adhesive dimensions are increased to accommodate larger objects, then attachment capacity is improved, but control over debonding process becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesive areaVSAvoiddebonding control
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Even when the total adhesive area is large to accommodate bigger objects, the adhesive is segmented into multiple regions that debond sequentially. This segmentation allows controlled removal by breaking down the large adhesive bond into manageable stages, maintaining ease of operation despite increased attachment capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The new NDAD design reduces the risk of injury and simplifies the attachment and detachment processes by ensuring a controlled and safe removal of objects, while maintaining a strong adhesive bond, and can accommodate larger objects and surfaces with increased adhesive dimensions.

Implementation Method 1

a hybrid carrier that stretches up to five times its bonded length without tearing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12029334B2Methods and apparatus for non-destructive adhesive devices
Publication Date: 2024.07.09 JACKSON JEFFERY L
  • US12029334B2 patent drawing
  • US12029334B2 patent drawing
  • US12029334B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A Non-Destructive Adhesive Device (NDAD) comprising a first end-user graspable tab, coupled to a first area of elastomeric material, coupled to an inelastic area, coupled to a second area of elastomeric material, coupled to a second end-user graspable tab, wherein the first and second areas of elastomeric material are adhesive on both sides, but the first side of the inelastic area is not adhesive. Wherein the second side of the NDAD is attached to an object, and the first side is attached to a wall. Wherein the first object is a mounting plate, for attaching various types of second objects to the wall. Wherein the first area of elastomeric material, the inelastic area, and the second area of elastomeric material are configured to place as much adhesive area as possible, on both sides of the NDAD, as close as possible to the topmost edge of the mounting plate.