Seamless Non-Linear to Linear Voltage Regulation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern processors and system-on-chips face challenges with increasing di/dt rates, leading to voltage droop and chatter on output supply nodes, which result in indeterministic Vmin and require larger guardbands, complicating high-volume manufacturing and validation.

Innovation Solution

A digital control scheme is implemented for a PID Type-III controller, transitioning seamlessly from non-linear to linear regulation modes, using a finite state machine to manage duty cycles and eliminate chatter, ensuring deterministic droop and reducing the need for VID boost features.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If non-linear clamp (NLC) is used to minimize voltage droop impact, then voltage droop is reduced, but output voltage chatter occurs due to bandwidth discrepancy between non-linear and linear control loops

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage droop mitigationVSAvoidoutput voltage stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic control loop bandwidth adjustment by modifying the linear controller bandwidth to match the non-linear controller bandwidth during transient conditions. This is achieved through dynamic modification of the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller parameters, allowing the system to transition from fixed bandwidth to adaptive bandwidth control, thereby eliminating chatter while maintaining voltage droop mitigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the bandwidth parameter of the linear control loop dynamically based on operating conditions. By adjusting the PID controller parameters (proportional gain, integral gain, derivative gain) in response to load transients, the system optimizes the bandwidth match between control loops, resolving the chatter issue without sacrificing voltage regulation performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If traditional linear control is used to ensure output voltage settles, then voltage stability is achieved, but it cannot cope with increasing di/dt rates causing voltage droop

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput voltage stabilityVSAvoidvoltage droop performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the advantages of both non-linear and linear control by integrating them into a unified control system. The non-linear clamp provides fast response to voltage droop, while the modified linear controller with adaptive bandwidth ensures smooth settling. The combination leverages the high bandwidth of non-linear control and the stability of linear control, achieving both voltage droop mitigation and chatter-free operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by proactively adjusting the linear controller bandwidth before voltage droop occurs or during early transient stages. The predictive current mode control and adaptive bandwidth adjustment prepare the linear controller to respond effectively, preventing voltage droop before it significantly impacts the output while ensuring smooth transition to steady-state operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Speed

If non-linear controller operates at high bandwidth to respond quickly, then fast voltage recovery is achieved, but it causes chatter requiring multiple NLC actions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage recovery speedVSAvoidcontrol loop complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the output of the non-linear controller and the state of the linear controller are continuously monitored. This feedback enables the system to detect when voltage recovery is complete and when to transition control to the linear controller, preventing chatter and reducing the need for multiple NLC actions. The feedback loop adjusts control parameters based on real-time voltage and current conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11658570B2Seamless non-linear voltage regulation control to linear control apparatus and method
Publication Date: 2023.05.23 INTEL CORP
  • US11658570B2 patent drawing
  • US11658570B2 patent drawing
  • US11658570B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A digital control scheme controls an integrator of a PID filter to implement non-linear control of saturating the duty cycle during which the proportional and derivative terms of the PID filter are set to 0 while the integrator and its internal states (previous values or memory) is set to a duty cycle that is the sum of the current nominal duty cycle plus a deltaD. The deltaD is the maximum duty cycle increment that is used to regulate a voltage regulator from ICCmin to ICCmax and is a configuration register that can be set post silicon. An FSM moves from a non-linear all ON state to an open loop duty cycle which maintains the output voltage slightly higher than the required Vref. After a certain period in this open loop, the FSM then ramps down the open loop duty cycle value until the output voltage is close to the Vref.