Non-Parallel Channel Catalyst Bed for Hybrid Rocket Ignition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing chemical rocket engines face inefficiencies in catalyzing the decomposition of propellants like nitrous oxide, particularly in hybrid rocket propulsion systems, where the solid fuel and liquid oxidizer interaction is not optimized for reliable and repeatable ignition.

Innovation Solution

A catalyst bed with a structured geometry, manufactured via additive manufacturing, is used to promote the catalytic decomposition of nitrous oxide into gaseous products, enhancing the interaction between the solid and liquid propellants by providing a non-parallel channel orientation and exposing catalysts on the channel surfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a traditional catalyst bed structure is used, then the device complexity is low, but the catalytic surface area is insufficient leading to poor decomposition efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecomposition efficiencyVSAvoidcatalyst bed structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a porous monolithic structure with interconnected channels and high surface area-to-volume ratio. This porous architecture provides extensive catalytic surface area while maintaining structural integrity, resolving the contradiction between decomposition efficiency and device complexity by using naturally porous materials rather than complex assembled structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from traditional two-dimensional catalyst surfaces to a three-dimensional monolithic structure with channels extending in multiple directions. This dimensional transformation increases the effective catalytic surface area without proportionally increasing the device footprint, thereby improving decomposition efficiency while controlling structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If the catalyst bed size is increased to provide more surface area, then the decomposition efficiency improves, but the reactor volume increases reducing compactness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic surface areaVSAvoidreactor volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The porous monolithic structure achieves high catalytic surface area within a compact volume by utilizing the internal pore network. The three-dimensional channel system provides extensive catalyst exposure without requiring a large external reactor volume, thus improving productivity while maintaining compactness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent embeds the catalyst-coated monolithic structure within the reactor, creating a nested configuration where the catalyst bed is integrated into the reactor volume rather than occupying separate space. This nesting approach maximizes the use of available reactor volume for catalytic function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Productivity

If non-parallel channel orientation is used, then the fluid-catalyst interaction is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid-catalyst interactionVSAvoidchannel geometry fabrication
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent varies the channel orientation parameters within the monolithic structure, creating non-parallel channels at different angles to enhance fluid-catalyst interaction. This parameter variation is achieved through controlled fabrication processes that can accommodate angular variations without significantly increasing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The monolithic structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides structural support, defines flow channels with optimized orientations, and supports the catalyst coating. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components, thereby maintaining ease of manufacture while achieving improved fluid-catalyst interaction through non-parallel channel geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The structured catalyst bed improves the reliability and repeatability of hybrid rocket ignition, allows for more efficient decomposition, and enables compact reactor designs with higher catalytic surface area, leading to increased thrust and oxidation strength.

Implementation Method 1

a catalyst promotes decomposition of the heated spray of the decomposable fluid into two or more gaseous decomposition products

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS12410765B2Catalytic decomposition reactors
Publication Date: 2025.09.09 FIREHAWK AEROSPACE INC
  • US12410765B2 patent drawing
  • US12410765B2 patent drawing
  • US12410765B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A catalyst bed includes a structure defining a plurality of channels configured to receive flow of fluid to be chemically catalyzed. The plurality of channels are oriented at least partially non-parallel to an overall flow direction of the flow from inputs of the plurality of channels to outputs of the plurality of channels. A catalyst is exposed at an exterior of the structure.