Non-Planar SCR With Parallel Fin Paths for Low-Voltage ESD Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional Silicon Controlled Rectifiers (SCRs) in non-planar technologies suffer from high turn-on and holding voltages, poor bipolar efficiency, and weak regenerative feedback, making them inadequate for efficient Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) protection in System on Chip (SoC) applications, especially in low voltage-high speed I/O and RF pads, due to current crowding and self-heating issues.

Innovation Solution

A novel SCR design with a parallel trigger path using fin-shaped or nanowire structures that bypasses the conventional base-emitter junction, providing independent forward bias current conduction and reducing trigger and holding voltages, along with nanostructures and shallow trench isolation to prevent current crowding, resulting in a device with sub-3V trigger and holding voltage and enhanced ESD robustness per unit area.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional SCR design is used in non-planar technologies, then ESD protection is provided, but trigger voltage and holding voltage become very high

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveESD protection capabilityVSAvoidtrigger voltage and holding voltage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The SCR structure is segmented into multiple fins distributed across the substrate, with each fin acting as an independent current conduction path. This segmentation allows the total ESD current to be distributed across multiple parallel paths, reducing the current density and self-heating in each individual fin, thereby enabling lower trigger and holding voltages while maintaining robust ESD protection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces localized doping regions (n+ and p+ regions) at specific positions within the fin structures to create localized high-field regions that facilitate carrier injection and reduce the turn-on voltage. The non-uniform doping profile creates optimal conditions for reducing trigger voltage without compromising the overall ESD protection performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If conventional SCR design is used in non-planar technologies, then ESD protection is provided, but bipolar efficiency and regenerative feedback become poor

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveESD protection capabilityVSAvoidbipolar efficiency and regenerative feedback
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The SCR is divided into multiple fins that provide parallel current conduction paths, enhancing the regenerative feedback mechanism by creating multiple feedback loops. This segmentation improves bipolar efficiency by distributing the current flow and reducing self-heating effects that degrade carrier multiplication, thereby strengthening the regenerative feedback essential for low-voltage operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fin structures are nested within the substrate with multiple fins arranged in a compact configuration, maximizing the use of available space while maintaining effective current conduction paths. This nested arrangement allows for improved bipolar efficiency by ensuring proper spatial distribution of the p-n-p-n structure components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Reliability

If conventional SCR design is used, then ESD protection is provided, but current crowding and self-heating issues occur

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveESD protection capabilityVSAvoidself-heating and current crowding
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The SCR structure is segmented into multiple fins distributed across the substrate, with each fin acting as an independent current conduction path. This segmentation allows the total ESD current to be distributed across multiple parallel paths, reducing the current density and self-heating in each individual fin, thereby enabling lower trigger and holding voltages while maintaining robust ESD protection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a planar SCR structure to a three-dimensional fin structure, utilizing the vertical dimension to create multiple current conduction paths. This dimensional change allows for better heat dissipation and reduced current crowding by distributing the current flow across multiple spatial locations, effectively managing thermal effects during ESD events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional planar SCR design is deployed to non-planar technologies, then device structure is maintained, but technological limitations prevent effective operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign compatibilityVSAvoidESD protection performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adapts the SCR design from a static planar structure to a dynamic three-dimensional fin structure that can be fabricated using standard non-planar CMOS processes. The fin structures can be dynamically adjusted in terms of their dimensions, spacing, and doping profiles to optimize performance for specific technology nodes, enabling effective ESD protection in advanced non-planar technologies while maintaining manufacturing compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed SCR design achieves efficient and robust ESD protection with three times better ESD robustness per unit area, low trigger and holding voltage, and compatibility with standard process flows, while maintaining low on-resistance and no added capacitive loading.

Implementation Method 1

The SCR device of FIG. 2 does not provide options for tuning its trigger or holding voltage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAvalanche breakdown: Avalanche Breakdown

Implementation Method 2

A novel SCR design with a parallel trigger path using fin-shaped or nanowire structures that bypasses the conventional base-emitter junction, providing independent forward bias current conduction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 3

along with nanostructures and shallow trench isolation to prevent current crowding, resulting in a device with sub-3V trigger and holding voltage and enhanced ESD robustness per unit area

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCurrent distribution: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS10211200B2Low trigger and holding voltage silicon controlled rectifier (SCR) for non-planar technologies
Publication Date: 2019.02.19 INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE
  • US10211200B2 patent drawing
  • US10211200B2 patent drawing
  • US10211200B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a Silicon Controlled Rectifier (SCR) in non-planar technology to provide a robust ESD protection in System on Chip employing non-planar technologies. The disclosed SCR incorporates wire or fin shaped nanostructures extending from p-type tap to cathode, from the cathode to anode, and from the anode to n-type tap to provide parallel trigger paths to prevent problem of current crowding at the base emitter junction that limits efficient turn-on in conventional SCRs. The proposed structure helps in offering lower trigger and holding voltage, and therefore very high failure currents. The disclosed SCR has sub-3V trigger and holding voltage to provide an efficient and robust ESD protection in SOCs. The proposed device also offers three times better ESD robustness per unit area. Further the proposed SCR has no added capacitive loading and is compatible with standard process flow and design rules.