Non-Uniform Attachment Comb Teeth for Skin Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hair cutting appliances and attachment combs face challenges in achieving a balance between cutting performance, hair lifting behavior, skin protection, and ease of operation, particularly in sensitive skin regions, where opposing design criteria such as comfort, safety, and performance are difficult to meet simultaneously.

Innovation Solution

The design of an attachment comb with non-uniform teeth, featuring lateral teeth with a larger tip radius than central teeth, which provides a supportive function to reduce skin contact pressure and improve hair lifting and cutting performance, while maintaining comfort and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If uniform teeth design is used in attachment comb, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but cutting performance and hair lifting behavior cannot be optimized simultaneously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomb manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidcutting performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the tooth geometry at different positions along the comb. Central teeth have a first tip radius while lateral teeth have a second, larger tip radius. This localized variation optimizes hair lifting and cutting performance at each position without compromising manufacturability, as the variation follows a systematic gradient pattern that can be implemented through standard manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements asymmetry by creating a non-uniform tooth configuration where teeth progressively change in size from central to lateral positions. The tip radius increases along the comb according to a gradient, creating an asymmetric pattern that optimizes both hair lifting behavior and cutting performance while maintaining a regular manufacturing approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Object-affected harmful factors

If larger tip radius is used for all teeth, then skin protection is improved, but hair lifting behavior and cutting performance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveskin contact pressureVSAvoidhair lifting behavior
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different tip radii to different tooth positions based on their specific functional requirements. Central teeth with smaller tip radii optimize hair lifting and cutting efficiency, while lateral teeth with larger tip radii reduce skin contact pressure. This localized differentiation resolves the contradiction by optimizing each position for its primary function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a dynamic approach by creating a gradient in tip radius values along the comb rather than using a fixed uniform size. The tip radius varies progressively from central to lateral teeth, allowing the comb to adapt its interaction characteristics with hair and skin across different zones, thereby simultaneously achieving good hair lifting and skin protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If smaller tip radius is used for all teeth, then cutting performance is improved, but skin safety and comfort worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting performanceVSAvoidskin safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating tooth geometry according to position-specific requirements. Central teeth with smaller tip radii maximize cutting performance where hair density is highest, while lateral teeth with larger tip radii provide skin protection at the comb edges where skin contact is more direct. This resolves the contradiction by optimizing cutting and safety at different locations simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Productivity

If non-uniform teeth design is implemented, then cutting performance and skin protection are optimized, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting performanceVSAvoidtooth configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements asymmetry through a systematic gradient in tip radius values that progresses predictably from central to lateral teeth. While the teeth are non-uniform, the variation follows a regular pattern that can be manufactured using standard processes, thereby achieving optimized cutting performance without excessive complexity in the device structure or manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS12076870B2Attachment comb, cutting head and hair cutting appliance
Publication Date: 2024.09.03 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US12076870B2 patent drawing
  • US12076870B2 patent drawing
  • US12076870B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An attachment comb, particularly a skin protecting comb, for a blade set of a cutting head of a hair cutting appliance, the attachment comb including a supporting frame and comb teeth that are arranged in a series and that define a skin contact zone at a top side thereof. The teeth extend from the supporting frame and include rounded tips at frontal ends thereof. Additionally, the teeth are non-uniform along the series and include two outer lateral teeth that define lateral ends of the series, along with central teeth arranged therebetween. At the lateral teeth, a lateral teeth tip radius (Rtl) is present that is greater than a tip radius (Rtc) of the central teeth. Also described herein is corresponding a cutting head and hair cutting appliance.