Non-Circular Intermediate Rotor for Engine Timing Drive
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing multi-stage control drives between a crankshaft and a camshaft in internal combustion engines face high friction forces due to disruptive resonance frequencies, which are not effectively reduced by using rotors with non-circular profiles in all speed ranges.
Innovation Solution
A multi-stage control drive design featuring rotors with a non-circular contour, specifically a simple oval shape with an amplitude between 0.1% to 5% of the pitch circle diameter, and a tensioning element with hydraulic damping to reduce friction losses and improve vibration behavior, allowing for cost-effective implementation without modifying the crankshaft or camshaft.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Stability of the object's composition
If rotors with non-circular profiles are used in multi-stage timing drives, then vibration behavior can be improved, but friction forces and power loss increase in individual speed ranges
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by modifying only the contour of the second rotor (intermediate rotor) while keeping the first rotor (crankshaft) and fourth rotor (camshaft) unchanged. This localized modification allows vibration reduction through non-circular profile features while avoiding the increased friction forces that would result from modifying all rotors. The non-circular contour is specifically applied to the intermediate rotor where it can counteract vibrations without proportionally increasing friction across the entire drive system.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements partial action by using a non-circular contour with specific geometric features (protruding and recessed areas) that provide sufficient vibration counteraction without excessive modification. The contour deviation from circular is optimized to be just enough to achieve vibration reduction while minimizing the increase in friction forces, avoiding over-engineering the solution.
2Loss of energy
If non-circular rotors are used to counteract vibrations, then power loss can be reduced, but the implementation complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent reduces implementation complexity by applying the non-circular contour modification only to the intermediate rotor (second rotor) rather than modifying all rotors in the multi-stage drive system. This localized approach achieves the desired power loss reduction while minimizing manufacturing and assembly complexity compared to comprehensive rotor modifications.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses a non-circular contour with controlled curvature variations (protruding and recessed areas) that can be manufactured using standard machining processes. The geometric features are designed to be practical for manufacturing while achieving the vibration counteraction and power loss reduction goals, avoiding overly complex three-dimensional shapes that would significantly increase implementation difficulty.
3Stability of the object's composition
If rotors with non-circular profiles are used in all speed ranges, then resonance frequencies can be addressed, but friction forces become excessively high
Solution Approach 1:
The patent addresses resonance frequencies effectively by concentrating the non-circular profile features on the intermediate rotor, which allows targeted vibration counteraction at critical resonance frequencies without applying friction-increasing modifications across the entire drive system. This localized approach optimizes resonance control while minimizing friction forces.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent applies partial action by using non-circular contour features that provide adequate resonance frequency control without excessive geometric deviation from a circular profile. The protruding and recessed areas are sized and positioned to address critical resonances while keeping friction forces within acceptable limits, avoiding over-engineering the contour complexity.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
The solution significantly reduces friction losses and power loss across all speed ranges, maintaining forces below 1,500 N, and effectively counteracts vibrations from various excitation elements, enhancing the overall efficiency and performance of the timing drive.
Implementation Method 1
a tensioning element with hydraulic damping to reduce friction losses
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2~3
Figure 4~5
AI summary
The invention relates to a multistage control drive between a crankshaft and at least one camshaft of an internal combustion engine according to the preamble of claim 1, in particular for an internal combustion engine to be used in a motor vehicle. The aim of the invention is to provide a multistage control drive between a crankshaft and at least one camshaft of an internal combustion engine with reduced friction, wherein the control drive can be implemented in an inexpensive manner. An internal combustion engine multistage control drive according to the invention comprises a crankshaft (46) and at least one camshaft, and the control drive (10) comprises a primary drive (12), by means of which a first rotor (24) coupled to a crankshaft (46) drives a second rotor (28) via a first belt drive structure (16). The second rotor (28) is rotationally fixed to a third rotor (34), and the third rotor (34) is the drive element of a secondary drive (14), by means of which a fourth rotor (38) coupled to the at least one camshaft is driven via a second belt drive structure (20). The second rotor (28) and/or the third rotor (34) has a noncircular contour.