Non-Circular Piston and Telescoping Valve Engine Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Internal combustion engines with circular cross-section pistons and cylinders face inefficiencies due to space and weight constraints, limited overhead space for valves and injectors, reliance on lubrication systems, and suboptimal flame propagation and force transfer, leading to reduced engine power and increased maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

The development of engines with non-circular cross-section pistons and cylinders, featuring a domed piston head and a poppet valve assembly with a multi-stage telescoping design, which reduces the need for lubrication, optimizes air and fuel mixing, and enhances valve timing for improved efficiency and power output.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If circular cross-section pistons and cylinders are used, then the engine structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the engine weight increases and overhead space for valves and injectors is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepiston and cylinder manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidengine weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by transitioning from circular to non-circular (oval or rectangular with rounded corners) piston and cylinder cross-sections. This asymmetric shape reduces the perimeter-to-area ratio, allowing smaller piston diameters for the same displacement, which directly reduces engine weight while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through standard casting and machining processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Device complexity

If circular cross-section pistons and cylinders are used, then the engine structure is simple, but the overhead space for intake valves, exhaust valves, auxiliary valves, spark plugs, glow plugs, fuel injectors and water injectors is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine structure simplicityVSAvoidoverhead space for valves and injectors
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The non-circular piston cross-section creates an asymmetric combustion chamber configuration that optimizes overhead space utilization. The oval or rectangular shape with rounded corners allows strategic placement of multiple valves and injectors in the available overhead space, improving access and arrangement without significantly increasing structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional circular cross-section to three-dimensional optimized shapes (oval or rectangular with rounded corners), utilizing the available space more efficiently in multiple dimensions. This dimensional optimization allows better accommodation of overhead components while maintaining compact engine geometry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If conventional piston designs are used, then the engine operates reliably, but lubrication systems are required increasing maintenance costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine operational reliabilityVSAvoidmaintenance cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by designing the piston-cylinder interface to be inherently lubrication-free through the non-circular cross-section geometry. The specific shape creates stable hydrodynamic pressure distribution and improved contact characteristics that enable reliable operation without external lubrication systems, eliminating maintenance associated with oiling mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If conventional piston designs are used, then the engine operates reliably, but flame propagation and force transfer are suboptimal reducing engine power

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine operational reliabilityVSAvoidengine power output
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric non-circular piston cross-section optimizes flame propagation by creating more uniform combustion chamber geometry that promotes consistent flame front development. The shape also improves force transfer characteristics between the gas pressure and piston surface, enhancing power output while maintaining reliable operation through proven combustion dynamics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS10590813B2Internal combustion engine
Publication Date: 2020.03.17 QUEST ENGINES LLC
  • US10590813B2 patent drawing
  • US10590813B2 patent drawing
  • US10590813B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Internal combustion engines having multi-stage telescoping poppet valves in lieu of conventional poppet valves are disclosed. The engines may have pistons with a skirt with a field of pockets that provide a ringless, non-lubricated, seal equivalent. The piston heads may include one or more depressions and may be domed to facilitate the movement of air/charge in the cylinder. The engines may also have non-circular, preferably rectangular, cross-section pistons and cylinders. The engines also may include a split crankshaft. The engines may use the pumping motion of the engine piston to supercharge the cylinder with air/charge. The engines also may operate in an inverted orientation in which the piston is closer to the local gravitationally dominant terrestrial body's center of gravity at top dead center position than at bottom dead center position.