Non-fluorinated Firefighting Foam Concentrate

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional firefighting foams rely on fluorinated surfactants, which are undesirable due to environmental concerns, and are ineffective against Class B fires involving flammable liquids.

Innovation Solution

Development of aqueous firefighting compositions that include a sugar component, a polysaccharide thickener, and a surfactant mixture comprising anionic, zwitterionic, and optionally nonionic surfactants, with a water-miscible organic solvent, and are substantially free of fluorinated compounds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If fluorinated surfactants are used in firefighting foam compositions, then the foam effectiveness against Class B fires is improved, but environmental harm increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefirefighting effectivenessVSAvoidenvironmental harm
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes fluorinated surfactants from the firefighting foam composition entirely, extracting the harmful component while maintaining the essential foam-forming functionality through alternative non-fluorinated surfactant systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters by substituting fluorinated compounds with non-fluorinated alternatives, specifically using surfactants based on hydrocarbons, esters, or other non-fluorinated molecules while adjusting concentrations and ratios to achieve comparable firefighting performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If non-fluorinated surfactants are used to replace fluorinated surfactants, then environmental harm is reduced, but firefighting effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental harmVSAvoidfirefighting effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite surfactant systems combining multiple non-fluorinated surfactant types (anionic, cationic, nonionic, or zwitterionic) along with co-surfactants and additives to achieve synergistic effects that replicate or exceed the performance of fluorinated surfactants

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs a multi-component formulation where various ingredients serve multiple functions: surfactants provide both foam generation and fire suppression, additives enhance stability and performance across different fire types (Class A and Class B), creating a universal composition that addresses diverse firefighting needs without fluorinated compounds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If conventional foam-forming compositions are used, then firefighting performance is maintained, but fluorinated compounds are present in the environment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefirefighting performanceVSAvoidfluorinated compound release
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the potential harm of fluorinated compound release into a benefit by deliberately formulating with non-fluorinated alternatives that provide comparable or superior performance while eliminating environmental contamination, effectively using the limitation as a driver for improved composition design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The compositions form effective firefighting foams that can extinguish both Class A and Class B fires without using fluorinated surfactants, addressing environmental concerns and improving firefighting efficacy.

Implementation Method 1

a surfactant mixture containing one or more of an aliphatic alcohol-based nonionic surfactant, an alkyl sulfate anionic surfactant, alkyl sulfonate anionic surfactant, and a zwitterionic surfactant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface tension reduction: Surfactant

Implementation Method 2

a polysaccharide thickener

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscosity enhancement:

Implementation Method 3

which may be aerated to form a firefighting foam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAeration: Aeration

Data Source

PatentUS12285640B2Fire-fighting foam concentrate
Publication Date: 2025.04.29 TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS LP

AI summary

A method of fighting a fire, the method includes aerating a firefighting foam composition to form an aerated firefighting foam; administering the aerated firefighting foam to a fire or applying the aerated firefighting foam to a surface of a volatile flammable liquid; wherein: the firefighting foam composition includes a sugar component comprising a monosaccharide sugar, a sugar alcohol, or a combination thereof; a polysaccharide thickener; a surfactant component comprising an anionic surfactant, a zwitterionic surfactant or a mixture of any two or more thereof; a water-miscible organic solvent; and at least about 30 wt. % water.