Power-Efficient Nonlinear Equalizer with Selective Controller

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-speed digital communications systems face power budget limitations due to the high computational requirements of nonlinear equalizers needed to counteract nonlinear channel effects, making them infeasible for use in fiberoptic channels.

Innovation Solution

A power-efficient nonlinear equalizer design that uses a combination of linear and nonlinear filters, with a controller to selectively enable the nonlinear filter only when significant equalization errors occur, reducing power consumption by minimizing the operational time of the nonlinear filter.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If nonlinear equalizers are used to counteract nonlinear channel effects, then compensation effectiveness is improved, but power consumption increases dramatically

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompensation effectivenessVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The equalizer dynamically switches between linear and nonlinear filter modes based on detected signal conditions. The controller monitors the receive signal and selectively enables the nonlinear filter only when channel nonlinearity exceeds a threshold, allowing the system to adapt its power consumption to actual channel conditions rather than operating at maximum power continuously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of applying full nonlinear equalization always, the system applies nonlinear filtering partially and selectively only when needed. The controller determines based on signal characteristics whether nonlinear effects are significant enough to warrant enabling the computationally intensive nonlinear filter, thus avoiding excessive power consumption during conditions where linear equalization suffices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Measurement precision

If filter length is increased to improve equalization performance, then compensation accuracy is improved, but computational complexity and power requirements increase quadratically or cubically

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequalization accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The equalizer is segmented into two distinct filter paths: a linear filter that operates continuously with low computational complexity, and a nonlinear filter that operates selectively with high computational complexity. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high equalization accuracy when needed while maintaining low power consumption during normal operation by keeping the nonlinear portion dormant

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The equalizer structure is designed to perform multiple functions through a single unified architecture that includes both linear and nonlinear filtering capabilities. The controller selectively activates the appropriate filter type based on channel conditions, making the system universally applicable to both linear and nonlinear channel scenarios without requiring separate dedicated systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11451417B1Power-efficient nonlinear equalizers and methods
Publication Date: 2022.09.20 CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP LTD
  • US11451417B1 patent drawing
  • US11451417B1 patent drawing
  • US11451417B1 patent drawing

AI summary

One illustrative equalizer converts a receive signal into a sequence of symbol decisions using: a linear filter that filters the receive signal as part of deriving a first sequence of equalized signal samples; a first decision element that derives a tentative sequence of symbol decisions from the first sequence of equalized signal samples; a nonlinear filter that, when enabled, applies nonlinear compensation to the linearly filtered receive signal as part of deriving a second sequence of equalized signal samples; a second decision element that, when enabled, derives replacement symbol decisions from the second sequence of equalized signal samples; a subtraction element that calculates an equalization error for each symbol decision in the tentative sequence; and a controller that selectively enables the nonlinear filter and the second decision element to obtain a replacement symbol decision for each symbol decision in the tentative sequence having an equalization error greater than a predetermined value.