Nonlinear Manifold Learning for Water Quality Parameter Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for estimating water quality parameters, such as nitrate concentration, often rely on linear surrogate models that are computationally manageable but lack accuracy, particularly for parameters difficult to measure directly.

Innovation Solution

The use of nonlinear manifold learning methods to predict water quality parameters by identifying clusters in multidimensional space, determining nonlinear modeling functions, and applying domain indicator functions to improve correlation between surrogate and target parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional linear surrogate models are used to estimate water quality parameters, then computational manageability is improved, but measurement precision and prediction accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational manageabilityVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies nonlinear manifold learning to transform the linear relationship assumption into a curved, nonlinear mapping between surrogate and target parameters. This curvature allows the model to capture complex nonlinear relationships in water quality data that linear models cannot represent, thereby improving prediction accuracy while maintaining computational feasibility through dimensionality reduction techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the parameter space by applying nonlinear transformations and manifold learning techniques to the surrogate parameters. This changes the mathematical representation from linear to nonlinear relationships, enabling the model to accurately predict target parameters like nitrate concentration that exhibit nonlinear behavior with respect to surrogate measurements such as turbidity and chlorophyll.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If direct measurement of target parameters is performed, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and measurement cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter measurement accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces surrogate parameters (turbidity, chlorophyll-a, temperature, conductivity) as intermediaries that are easier to measure than the target parameters (nitrate, phosphate, ammonia). These surrogate measurements serve as mediators that, when processed through nonlinear manifold learning, provide accurate estimates of the target parameters without requiring complex direct measurement systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a mathematical copy or surrogate representation of the target parameter relationships through nonlinear manifold learning. Instead of directly measuring complex target parameters, the system learns a nonlinear mapping from easily measurable surrogate parameters to target parameters, effectively copying the target parameter behavior through the surrogate measurements and learned relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250020624A1Systems and methods for determining water quality parameters
Publication Date: 2025.01.16 FLYING GYBE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LIQUIDATING TRUST FOR PATENTS & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
  • US20250020624A1 patent drawing
  • US20250020624A1 patent drawing
  • US20250020624A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Target water quality parameters may be estimated based on measurements of surrogate water quality parameters, which may be easier to measure than the target parameters. Systems and methods in accordance with aspects of the present teachings may include determining correlations between surrogate parameters and a target parameter using a training sample of data, and using the correlations to estimate values of the target parameter corresponding to out-of-sample measurements of the surrogate parameters. In some examples, determining the correlation between the surrogate parameters and the target parameter includes developing a nonlinear surrogate model that can be described as an almost piecewise linear model.