Nonlinear Precoding for MLSE Receivers Using Controlled ISI

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing linear equalization methods in communication systems suffer from noise enhancement and error propagation due to inter-symbol interference (ISI), while channel state information at the transmitter requires significant transmit power, and conventional Tomlinson-Harashima precoding (THP) cancels ISI completely, preventing decoders from exploiting residual ISI for improved decoding.

Innovation Solution

Adapted THP precoding introduces controlled ISI by modifying transmit sequences to maximize the minimum Euclidean distance of received sequences, allowing decoders like MLSE to leverage this ISI for enhanced decoding performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If linear equalization is used at the receiver to eliminate ISI, then ISI-free signals are achieved, but noise power is significantly enhanced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveISI eliminationVSAvoidnoise enhancement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of applying inverse filtering at the receiver to cancel ISI, the patent applies inverse filtering at the transmitter through non-linear precoding. This inverts the location of the equalization operation from receiver to transmitter, thereby eliminating ISI before transmission without enhancing noise at the receiver.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs ISI cancellation in advance at the transmitter using non-linear precoding algorithms (such as Tomlinson-Harashima precoding) before the signal is transmitted through the channel. This preliminary action prevents ISI from being introduced in the first place, rather than attempting to remove it after reception.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If decision-feedback equalization is used to combat noise enhancement, then noise power is reduced, but error propagation occurs when symbols are detected incorrectly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise power reductionVSAvoiderror propagation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs ISI cancellation at the transmitter before transmission, so that by the time the signal reaches the receiver, ISI has already been removed. This eliminates the need for decision-feedback equalization at the receiver, thereby avoiding error propagation while still achieving noise power reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If feedback equalizer is implemented at the transmitter to eliminate ISI, then ISI-free signals are achieved, but transmit power is significantly increased

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveISI eliminationVSAvoidtransmit power
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs non-linear precoding algorithms that modify the signal parameters through non-linear transformations (such as modulo operations in Tomlinson-Harashima precoding). These parameter changes enable ISI cancellation without requiring the significant increase in transmit power that would be needed for linear feedback equalization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the conventional approach by applying non-linear precoding at the transmitter that achieves ISI cancellation more efficiently than linear feedback equalization, thereby eliminating ISI without the associated significant power penalty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If non-linear precoding is used to eliminate ISI at the transmitter, then noise enhancement is avoided, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise enhancement avoidanceVSAvoidprecoding algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs non-linear precoding algorithms that modify signal parameters through mathematical transformations. While these algorithms are more complex than linear equalization, they avoid noise enhancement and can be implemented using standard digital signal processing techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12375326B2Non-linear precoding for maximum likelihood sequence estimation (MLSE) receiver
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 CIENA CORP
  • US12375326B2 patent drawing
  • US12375326B2 patent drawing
  • US12375326B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the subject disclosure may include, for example, obtaining a data signal that includes a stream of symbols, modifying the data signal, resulting in a modified data signal, such that there is inter-symbol interference (ISI) when the modified data signal is received by a receiver, and transmitting the modified data signal over a channel to the receiver, wherein the ISI is distinct from an inverse of the channel and is introduced based on the modifying to be exploited by a decoder in the receiver for enhanced decoding. Other embodiments are disclosed.