Nonlinear Toolface Control for Rotary Steerable Drilling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wellbore drilling systems face challenges in maintaining a consistent toolface angle due to disturbances like vibrations, bit walk, and bit bounce, leading to deviations from the desired drilling direction, which increases drilling time and cost.

Innovation Solution

A nonlinear toolface control system for rotary steerable drilling tools that uses a combination of feed-forward and feedback controllers, decoupling nonlinearities and disturbances, and employing models to predict and adjust the toolface angle, ensuring precise control of the drill bit orientation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional drilling systems are used without advanced control mechanisms, then the device complexity is reduced, but the manufacturing precision and stability of toolface angle deteriorate due to disturbances like vibrations and bit walk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetoolface angle control precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control mechanism where the actual toolface angle is continuously measured and compared with the desired toolface angle. The controller adjusts the drilling system parameters based on the error signal to maintain precise toolface control, directly resolving the contradiction between control precision and system complexity by introducing intelligent regulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical steering mechanisms with a control system that uses sensors, processors, and actuators to achieve toolface control. This substitution allows for more precise control through electronic regulation rather than purely mechanical means, addressing the precision-complexity tradeoff.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If conventional drilling methods are used, then the device complexity is lower, but the productivity decreases due to increased drilling time from frequent direction adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling speedVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback control system continuously monitors toolface angle and makes real-time adjustments, preventing deviations that would require costly and time-consuming drilling interruptions. This maintains optimal drilling speed and direction, directly improving productivity while using intelligent control rather than complex mechanical systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system automatically adjusts drilling parameters to maintain optimal toolface angle without requiring manual intervention or frequent stopping of drilling operations. The system serves itself by detecting deviations and correcting them autonomously, thereby maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If advanced control systems are implemented to maintain toolface angle, then the manufacturing precision improves, but the use of energy increases due to continuous monitoring and adjustment mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetoolface angle consistencyVSAvoidenergy consumption of control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback control system uses energy efficiently by only making adjustments when deviations from the desired toolface angle are detected. The continuous monitoring is complemented by event-driven control actions, reducing unnecessary energy consumption while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system applies corrections only when and where needed rather than continuously maximizing control effort. By using partial action - making adjustments only when deviations occur - the system maintains precision while minimizing energy consumption from the control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10883355B2Nonlinear toolface control system for a rotary steerable drilling tool
Publication Date: 2021.01.05 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US10883355B2 patent drawing
  • US10883355B2 patent drawing
  • US10883355B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure, systems and methods for a nonlinear toolface control system for a rotary steerable drilling tool is disclosed. The method includes determining a desired toolface of a drilling tool, calculating a toolface error by determining a difference between a current toolface and the desired toolface, generating a model to describe the dynamics of the drilling tool, modify the model, based on at least one intermediate variable, to create a modified model, calculating a correction to reduce the toolface error, the correction based on the modified model, transmitting a signal to the drilling tool such that the signal adjusts the current toolface based on the correction, and drilling a wellbore with a drill bit oriented at the desired toolface.