Nonsymmetric Freeform Three-Mirror Optical System Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current optical systems, such as coaxial and off-axis meridian symmetric systems, face challenges in designing compact optical systems for limited spaces with non-symmetrical shapes, as they have constraints on spatial position and usability due to central obstructions and limited field of view.

Innovation Solution

A nonsymmetric freeform surface optical system with a three-mirror structure, including a primary, secondary, and tertiary reflecting mirror, designed using a point-by-point direct design method, allowing for three-dimensional light deflection and a 45° β tilt, which increases design freedom and compactness by eliminating symmetry constraints.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If coaxial or off-axis meridian symmetric optical systems are used, then mature design methods and products are available, but they cannot be fitted into limited spaces with non-symmetrical shapes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to limited non-symmetrical spacesVSAvoiddesign freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by designing an off-axis three-mirror optical system without meridian symmetry, where the mirrors are positioned and oriented asymmetrically relative to the optical axis. This allows the system to adapt to non-symmetrical spatial constraints while maintaining imaging functionality, directly resolving the contradiction between adaptability to limited spaces and design freedom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Ease of operation

If off-axis systems are used to solve central obstruction and limited field of view, then usable central field of view with good image quality improves, but space utilization in non-symmetrical spaces remains difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveusable central field of viewVSAvoidfitting into non-symmetrical spaces
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dimensionality change by transitioning from a traditional two-dimensional off-axis configuration to a three-dimensional spatial arrangement of three mirrors. The mirrors are positioned at different locations and orientations in 3D space, allowing the optical path to be folded and adapted to non-symmetrical spaces while maintaining a large usable central field of view.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional optical systems are used, then design methods are mature, but design freedom and space utilization are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemature design methodsVSAvoiddesign freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the optical system into three separate mirror elements rather than using a single optical component or a traditional two-element system. Each mirror can be independently designed, positioned, and optimized, providing greater design freedom while still using conventional mirror manufacturing techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The nonsymmetric freeform surface optical system achieves a more compact and flexible design, enabling full utilization of limited space with improved imaging quality and increased field of view, while maintaining good image quality and distortion control.

Implementation Method 1

a primary reflecting mirror, a secondary reflecting mirror, and a tertiary reflecting mirror. The light from the object is reflected on the primary reflecting mirror to form a first reflected light beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

The first reflected light beam irradiates the secondary reflecting mirror and is reflected to form a second reflected light beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 3

The second reflected light beam irradiates the third reflecting mirror and is reflected to form a third reflected light beam, and the third reflected light beam reaches the image surface to form an image

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS11555988B2Nonsymmetric freeform surface optical system
Publication Date: 2023.01.17 HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO LTD
  • US11555988B2 patent drawing
  • US11555988B2 patent drawing
  • US11555988B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present application relates to a nonsymmetric freeform surface optical system including a primary reflecting mirror, a secondary reflecting mirror, and a tertiary reflecting mirror. A light beam from an object is reflected on the primary reflecting mirror to form a first reflected light beam, the first reflected light beam irradiates the secondary reflecting mirror and is reflected to form a second reflected light beam, the second reflected light beam irradiates the third reflecting mirror and is reflected to form a third reflected light beam, and the third reflected light beam reaches an image surface to form an image. The nonsymmetric freeform surface optical system has no rotational symmetry and no meridional symmetry.