Animal Nose Print Recognition via Optical Stabilization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current animal identification methods, particularly those using nose patterns, face challenges such as direct physical contact requirements, movement obstruction issues, and limitations in accommodating different species and environmental conditions, leading to inaccuracies and practical difficulties in non-professional applications.

Innovation Solution

An animal recognition apparatus and method utilizing a body stabilizer unit to minimize animal movement, an image acquisition unit for indirect illumination and flexible image capture, and an image recognition unit for generating and verifying nose pattern codes, enabling non-contact, accurate identification across various species and conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If direct physical contact methods (ink impressions) are used to capture nose patterns, then the identification process can be performed with simple equipment, but the accuracy deteriorates due to ink bleeds, distortions, and laborious processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of equipmentVSAvoidnose pattern accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical ink impression system with an optical imaging system using a digital camera. Instead of physically transferring ink from the nose to paper, the system uses light to capture the nose pattern image digitally, eliminating ink bleeds and distortions while maintaining equipment simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates an optical copy (digital image) of the nose pattern instead of a physical ink copy. This digital copying method preserves the accuracy of the original nose pattern without the degradation issues inherent in physical ink transfer methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If traditional animal identification methods (ear tagging, branding) are used, then ownership proof is established, but the animal and handlers are put in potential harm's way

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproof of ownershipVSAvoidharm to animal and handler
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical modification methods (branding, tagging) with a non-contact optical imaging method. The digital camera captures nose patterns without touching or altering the animal, eliminating the physical harm associated with traditional identification methods while maintaining reliable identification capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The nose pattern serves as the animal's own unique identifier without requiring external tags or modifications. The animal's natural nose pattern is used directly for identification, eliminating the need for separate identification devices that could cause harm

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If external markers (ear tags, brands) are used for identification, then ownership can be proven, but the markers become damaged by physical activities or vandalism

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification capabilityVSAvoidintegrity of identification marker
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a digital copy of the nose pattern stored in memory instead of a physical marker on the animal. This digital record cannot be physically damaged or vandalized, ensuring long-term stability of the identification capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces physical markers that can be damaged with a digital imaging and storage system. The identification information is captured optically and stored electronically, eliminating susceptibility to physical damage from animal activities or human vandalism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If ink impression methods are used on moist animal noses, then nose patterns can be captured, but the process becomes laborious and requires frequent reapplication

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenose pattern captureVSAvoidtime for ink transfer process
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the time-consuming ink transfer process with instant optical imaging. The digital camera captures the nose pattern image immediately without requiring ink application, drying time, or transfer steps, dramatically reducing the time and effort required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables continuous identification operations without the intermittent labor of reapplying ink. The optical system can capture images rapidly and consecutively, maintaining continuous useful action without the workflow interruptions inherent in ink-based methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentEP4140294A1Device for recognizing animal's identity by using animal nose prints
Publication Date: 2023.03.01 ISCILAB CORP
  • EP4140294A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4140294A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4140294A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to an apparatus and method of an animal recognition using nose patterns, and particularly to an apparatus and method of an animal recognition comprising a body stabilizer unit to minimize movement of the subject animal for optimal nose pattern image acquisition, an image acquisition unit to obtain and store the nose pattern image, and an image recognition unit to generate, enroll, verify, and identify the raw or processed nose pattern code from the acquired nose pattern image.