Notching Machine Shear Cutting Contradiction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing notching machines for paper sheets face issues with size flexibility, slow processing, and aesthetic quality due to the limitations of primary and secondary cutting units, particularly the pressure cut method which is unreliable and increases maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

A notching machine with a movable carriage and synchronized primary and secondary cutting units, utilizing shear cuts to improve efficiency and adaptability to box thickness, featuring a mechanical transmission system and adjustable cutting positions to ensure precise cuts without wrinkles or defects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a pressure cutting unit is used to make secondary cuts, then the cutting process can be simplified, but the reliability of the cut decreases and maintenance costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting unit structureVSAvoidcut reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting process is divided into two independent shear cutting units instead of one pressure cutting unit. Each unit has its own blade and anvil, allowing simultaneous operation on different corners of the paper sheet. This segmentation eliminates the reliability issues of pressure cutting while maintaining structural simplicity through parallel processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables continuous cutting operation by having multiple cutting units work simultaneously on different corners of the paper sheet. The carriage moves continuously through the work area, and multiple cuts are made in sequence without interruption, eliminating the need to stop for manual intervention or sequential processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Device complexity

If a single cutting unit is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the processing speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting assembly structureVSAvoidnotching speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The single cutting unit is segmented into multiple independent cutting units (first and second cutting units) that can operate simultaneously. Each unit has its own blade, anvil, and cutting mechanism, allowing parallel processing of multiple corners on the paper sheet, thereby increasing productivity without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple cutting units are merged into a single integrated system mounted on the carriage. The first and second cutting units work together on the same paper sheet, combining their cutting actions to process multiple corners simultaneously, thus increasing productivity while maintaining a unified device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the cutting unit is movable to adjust position, then adaptability to different box sizes is improved, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebox size adaptabilityVSAvoidposition adjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The carriage is designed with dynamic positioning capability, allowing it to move along the longitudinal axis to different positions for cutting. This dynamic adjustment enables the machine to adapt to different box sizes and paper sheet dimensions. The system can quickly reposition between cuts without complete stops, minimizing time loss while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The carriage is pre-positioned at the optimal cutting location before each cutting operation. The system anticipates the required position and moves the carriage accordingly, eliminating unnecessary adjustment time during the cutting process. This preliminary positioning ensures that when cutting is needed, the system is already in the correct state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If primary and secondary cuts are made simultaneously, then processing time is reduced, but the manufacturing precision decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenotching efficiencyVSAvoidcut precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting process is segmented into multiple independent shear cutting operations performed by separate cutting units. Each cutting unit maintains precise control over its own blade and anvil interaction, ensuring accurate cuts. The segmentation allows simultaneous operation on different corners while preserving precision through independent control of each cutting action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the pressure-based cutting mechanism with a shear-based mechanical cutting system. The shear cutting action, achieved through blade and anvil interaction in a controlled mechanical motion, provides both speed and precision. This mechanical substitution eliminates the precision issues associated with pressure cutting while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances processing speed, reliability, and aesthetic quality by enabling simultaneous shear cuts, reducing maintenance costs, and ensuring accurate adaptation to box thickness, thereby improving the overall efficiency and quality of notched paper blanks.

Implementation Method 1

The primary blade is slidable relative to the anvil along a cutting orientation perpendicular to the worktop plane to make a primary shear cut

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear cut: Shear Stress

Implementation Method 2

The secondary blade is slidable relative to the secondary anvil along the cutting orientation to make a corresponding secondary shear cut

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear cut: Shear Stress

Data Source

PatentEP3766649B1Notching machine
Publication Date: 2024.10.30 EMMECI SPA
  • EP3766649B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3766649B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3766649B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A notching machine (1) for making a paper blank from a corresponding paper sheet comprises: a frame (10); a supporting surface (S) defining a worktop (P); a carriage (132), movable in parallel with the worktop (P); a primary cutting unit (141A), associated with the carriage and including a primary blade (141A') and a primary anvil (141A") slidable relative to each other along a cutting orientation (C) perpendicular to the worktop (P) to make a primary shear cut (T1); a secondary cutting unit (142A), associated with the carriage (132) and including a secondary blade (142A') and a secondary anvil (142A"), slidable relative to each other along a cutting orientation (C) to make a secondary shear cut (T2); an actuating assembly, configured to move the primary blade (141A') relative to the primary anvil (141A") and the secondary blade (142A') relative to the secondary anvil (142A") along the cutting orientation (C).