Container Orchestration Testing with Notebook-Generated Pipelines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Testing container orchestration platforms for changes is resource-intensive and difficult due to infrastructure abstraction, making it challenging to identify impacted pipelines and ensuring proper execution.

Innovation Solution

Automated testing using training notebooks to generate test pipelines, extracting executable code, and performing cluster tests to ensure compatibility and functionality across multiple pipelines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional testing methods are used for container orchestration platforms, then comprehensive testing coverage can be achieved, but resource consumption increases and testing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting accuracyVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates virtual copies of pipeline configurations from training notebooks to generate test pipelines. Instead of manually creating test environments, the system automatically copies and adapts production pipeline definitions into test versions, enabling comprehensive testing with reduced resource overhead through virtualization and automated code generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary extraction of executable code elements from training notebooks before actual testing begins. By pre-processing and preparing test pipeline configurations in advance, the system eliminates redundant setup operations during execution, reducing overall resource consumption while maintaining testing thoroughness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If infrastructure abstraction is implemented in container orchestration platforms, then deployment complexity is reduced, but identifying impacted pipelines during testing becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment simplicityVSAvoidpipeline impact identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that track and report which pipelines are impacted by infrastructure changes. By monitoring execution results and comparing test outcomes against expected behaviors, the system automatically identifies affected pipelines and provides feedback to stakeholders, maintaining visibility despite infrastructure abstraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses visual indicators (analogous to color changes) to highlight impacted pipelines in test results. Different states of pipeline execution are represented through distinct visual markers, making it easy to identify which pipelines were affected by infrastructure changes without requiring deep technical analysis of abstracted configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

3Reliability

If manual testing processes are used for each pipeline, then testing thoroughness can be maintained, but testing time and productivity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting thoroughnessVSAvoidtesting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates universal test pipelines that can execute multiple testing scenarios through parameter configuration rather than separate manual test definitions. A single test pipeline framework serves multiple functions by dynamically loading different test cases from extracted code elements, enabling comprehensive testing across all pipelines without requiring individual manual testing for each one.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges multiple testing operations into unified automated workflows. By combining code extraction, test pipeline generation, and execution into a single automated process, the system maintains thoroughness that would otherwise require separate manual testing steps while dramatically improving overall testing efficiency through consolidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250321869A1Automated container orchestration platform testing
Publication Date: 2025.10.16 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US20250321869A1 patent drawing
  • US20250321869A1 patent drawing
  • US20250321869A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some implementations, a device may obtain, via a notebook repository, one or more training notebooks that are associated with respective pipeline types of the container orchestration platform. The device may extract, from the one or more training notebooks, one or more executable code elements, to obtain one or more sets of executable code for respective training notebooks of the one or more training notebooks. The device may insert testing information into respective sets of executable code of the one or more sets of executable code to generate one or more test pipelines. The device may perform, via the container orchestration platform, one or more cluster tests using respective test pipelines from the one or more test pipelines. The device may provide, for display, result information indicating results of the one or more cluster tests.