Nozzle Array Ejection Density Control for Ripple Mark Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional printing devices with high-density nozzle arrangements and high-speed print heads often produce uneven print results due to ripple marks, leading to deteriorated print speed and quality.

Innovation Solution

The printing device achieves the target print resolution by moving a nozzle array with a lower nozzle pitch and ejecting liquid droplets from the same or another nozzle array, while applying preset rate thinning to adjust ejection density across nozzle blocks, allowing for efficient control of ripple marks without interpolating print regions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If thinning is performed to prevent ripple marks by interpolating images at plural passes, then ripple marks are eliminated, but print speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprint qualityVSAvoidprint speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The nozzle array is divided into multiple nozzle blocks with different ejection densities. By segmenting the nozzle array, the system can selectively control which nozzles eject at each pass, enabling ripple mark prevention without requiring multiple interpolation passes, thus maintaining print speed while improving print quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different nozzle blocks are assigned different ejection densities based on their positions and functions. This local differentiation allows the system to optimize printing performance in different regions, preventing ripple marks where needed while maintaining high print speed in other areas, resolving the contradiction between quality and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If a high density nozzle array is used to achieve high print resolution, then target print resolution is improved, but ripple marks occur more frequently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprint resolutionVSAvoidripple marks
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The high-density nozzle array is segmented into multiple nozzle blocks with varying ejection densities. This segmentation allows the system to maintain the high resolution capability of the dense nozzle array while selectively suppressing ripple marks by controlling which nozzle blocks eject at each pass, thus resolving the contradiction between resolution and ripple mark prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The ejection density parameter is dynamically adjusted across different nozzle blocks. By changing the ejection density parameter locally in different nozzle blocks, the system can maintain high print resolution where needed while reducing ripple marks in other regions, achieving both high resolution and ripple mark prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If thinning is applied at high rates to control ripple marks, then ripple mark control is improved, but ejection density and print quality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveripple mark controlVSAvoidejection density
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Different nozzle blocks are assigned different ejection densities based on their specific functions and positions. This local quality differentiation allows the system to apply thinning only where necessary to control ripple marks, while maintaining high ejection density in other regions to preserve print quality, thus resolving the contradiction between ripple mark control and ejection density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements local quality control by assigning different ejection densities to different nozzle blocks. This allows selective thinning in specific regions to control ripple marks while maintaining high ejection density in other regions, preventing the overall deterioration of print quality that would occur with uniform high-rate thinning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8926039B2Printing device and printing method
Publication Date: 2015.01.06 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US8926039B2 patent drawing
  • US8926039B2 patent drawing
  • US8926039B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a printing device, printing is performed by relatively moving a nozzle array for ejecting a liquid droplet with respect to a print medium, a resolution by a nozzle pitch of the nozzle array is lower than a target print resolution, and between liquid droplets ejected by a single nozzle array, liquid droplets are ejected from the same or another nozzle array to attain the target print resolution. Each of a plurality of nozzles in the single nozzle array is printable by changing an ejection density by applying a preset rate thinning when ejecting liquid droplets by relatively moving with respect to the print medium. The printing device is provided with a print control part configured to perform printing by dividing the single nozzle array into a plurality of nozzle blocks and determining the ejection density in every nozzle blocks.